Fermat's Last Theorem - Inside Your Calculator
Loading...
Loading...
3:34
Visualizing Fermat's Last Theoremby andjorhanson3,622 views- 8:58
Fermat's Last Theoremby javoss88881,836 views
- 1:45
Mathematics geniusby resvol2171,594 views
- 2:51
Fermat's last theorem.wmv arthurknight1 The basic nature of the universe No 27by arthurknight11,956 views
- 0:39
The great moment at which Andrew Wiles solved Fermat's last theorem, in 1994by fsgm11,741 views
- 3:53
the 5th Fermat number is not a prime (german)by gu17291,933 views
- 10:00
Fermat's Marvelous Proof - Beyond Wiles 2010by MrLStamford3,424 views
- 9:32
Calculating Square Roots - Inside Your Calculatorby InsideYourCalculator2,231 views
- 7:35
O Último teorema de Fermat - 5by funnada16,248 views
- 0:59
Probably the fastest worm game for old Casio CFXby aajiikoo7,910 views
- 9:58
O Último teorema de Fermat - 3by funnada15,061 views
- 10:00
Andrew Wiles and Fermat's Last Theorem Iby x1x2x3ct1,776 views
- 6:54
Huygen and Fermat's Principles Part Iby kridnix3,363 views
- 1:07
Eight Wonders of the Mathematical Worldby kautilya33374,168 views
- 8:39
Fermat's Last Theorem (1996) Part 4 of 5by raskolnikov187321,318 views
- 4:23
Fast Math Trickby glad2teach1,809,586 views
- 13:16
Fermat's Last Theorem 3/4 (BBC Horizon 1996)by Cromulentable18,186 views
- 0:20
Solutions of Fermat's Equationby wolframmathematica4,057 views
- 6:47
John B - Fermat's Theorem (CD Mix)by antgto1,778 views
I think I am very close to a proof of FLT, and something actually much greater based on a new type of mathematics I have discovered (which I found by examining the works of Fermat closely), but 500 characters is too short to contain it.
ThinkTank255 2 months ago
@SNUGandSESOR for integers they're the same
AllHailZeppelin 6 months ago
where is part 2?
madbowler6 7 months ago
n≥3 ≠ n>2 FYI
SNUGandSESOR 8 months ago
@coooldude777 - I was merely stating that it handles large values and will calculate the large products in his sample. With a good library, BASIC could do the same thing. e.g. In Python, you could print 5034958902834239048902384**2929348 without an issue. - So it was merely a statement. - BTW, calling others stupid wasn't out of line but calling me a noob is outright slanderous! :)
TLucretiusCarus 11 months ago
@TLucretiusCarus
are you stupid? A programming language itself has nothing to do with "how well" it works with numbers
nice try n00bie
coooldude777 1 year ago
@NiteAngel That's the point, it's a seemingly simple question and yet there is no simple proof. In fact it takes some of the most complex mathematics in the world to prove this, and was only proven very recently
subatomicparticlephy 1 year ago
...And where is the second part to this video?
LovelyYTRocks 1 year ago
@pyramidiot1 simple terms.1*1/1+1-1=1......let switch it backwards 1-1+1/1*1=1........lets mix it.....1+1*1-1/1=1 why is this significant?
972trev 1 year ago
I ran across this, don't understand it or understand the significance? I was searching for the number 3 which is the first fermat's number, he just said fermat's made it as a (what they thought) joke. After so long, he just goes on and on and on and on and on.....please someone tell me why would this be necessary to learn?
972trev 1 year ago