India Tomorrow - The Gujarat Miracle Part 1/5

This is the famous video made by Mayank Jain, a brilliant and young documentary maker. The 1st part is about terrorism and the Congress party led government's deliberate weak and inadequate responses that have compromised India's interests. The Election Commission has moved a gag order severely censoring this revealing documentary. We feel that the decision to censure this documentary is errorneous, bad in judgement and exhibits an over-zealous outlook towards issues highlighting the Congress party's weaknesses. However, in the interest of freedom of speech as enshrined in the Constitution of India, we as patriotic Indians feel that it is our duty to put forth the uncensored version of this documentary in front of the world.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Mayank
• Jain
• Narendra
• Modi
• Gujarat
• election
• commission
• development
• political
• commercial
• documentary

[tigersoup]

so did hindu brothers! they were burnt alive by muslims! and thats what caused the riots! Mumbai has been bombed thrice... what did Hindu's did then? Kashmir pandits were dragged out of their houses and killed! what did they do to warrant that? Its not fair to blame just modi... muslims get a free air ticket to go to mecca! which country does that? none! so lets not fuck each other. lets do something for this country. Modi is far better than any of the congress men and any in Muslim league!

[littlepakistan]

We must teplicate this in all indian states.

[loralundchut]

the great leader and the NEXT PRIME MINISTER OF HINDUSTAN AFTER INDIRA GANDHI

ye muslaman maan ke laude pure samaj ke liya khatra hai, is madharchod katua ko desh se nikalo, iske gand me HANUMAN ji GADA dal do, maan ke laude katua terrorist. MUslims are AIDS of world, so do sex with muslims but orally, fuck bastard muslims

[mandeepjh]

Any one can see the difference between rai-barrely where from last 50 years congress winning their ls election with any constituancy from Gujrat. Rai barrely is still tribal area, you know why because congress don't want to change the situation due to vote.

[mandeepjh]

This congress is shit party and used to be from last fifty years. We can find the difference of 50 years of congress and 6 years of bjp. Now people should gave chance to bjp with modiji as pm of India. He

[acerb45666555]

the act of censoring this documentary is like the government waving a big flag that says, "We cannot run our own lands and we are embarrased by our big mistakes"! so, by censoring this, the whole world now knows the truth!

[pooran411]

narender modi is great......

[spacekangaroo]

@arnotkaling:

You still don't know what an Indo-Aryan language is?!?

I've already explained this to you! Did you not read my previous posts? Please go back and read them. The Indo-Aryan language group is something you would learn about in the most basic, introductory course in linguistics. The fact that you don't even know what this is proves that you really shouldn't be talking about languages.

Before uttering another idiotic word, you need to learn this basic fact.

[spacekangaroo]

@arnotkaling:

I'm losing the argument because I protest minor differences? These differences illustrate the etymologies of the words in question and give us insight into the relationships between languages.

The idea that you equate linguistic detail with "losing the argument" shows me that you are even more stupid than I thought. You are incapable of reasoning or rational argument.

Go ahead, call me "dumbass" again, since that seems to be your substitute for actual intelligent dialogue.

[spacekangaroo]

@arnotkaling:

There is a theory that the word "Bengal" comes from the name "Vanga" which is a Dravidian name. However, just because it is a Dravidian name, that doesn't make it Tamil. It comes from other older Dravidian languages. The modern people of Bengal have some Dravidian ancestry, but NOT Tamil ancestry.

Their language, however, is NOT Dravidian. Its underlying grammatical origion is Indo-Aryan. I hope you've learned what that is by now.

[spacekangaroo]

@arnotkaling:

"Stan" comes from Persian and "Sthan" comes from Sanskrit. Again these language have many such similar words. The suffix "-stan" in the modern Islamic countries such as Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan comes from Persian because these countries were influences by Persian. However, the suffix in the name Rajasthan comes from Sanskrit.

[spacekangaroo]

The ancient Indus Valley Civilization was a Dravidian civilization, not a "Tamil civilization". Tamil did not exist at that time, and neither did Malayalam, Kannada, or any other Dravidian language. The original Dravidian language gave rise to the modern Dravidian languages.

In the same way. Hindi, Punjabi, or Bengali did not exist at that time. At that time, these were still a single language: the Sanskrit language, which gradually gave rise to these languages.