Kurt Warner fumbles, it WAS reviewed- Super Bowl XLIII

Here's an explanation from the league of the fumble committed by Kurt Warner in the last remaining seconds of Super Bowl XLIII. The SOLE reason the Cardinals lost the Super Bowl was due to the fact that they were unable to stop the Steelers from scoring a touchdown on an 88 yard drive with 2:37 left to play in the game. PERIOD. Notice you only hear naive Cardinals fans stating they were "robbed"; not ANY of the players, not ANY commentator from ANY news source, just ignorant fans.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Cardinals
• fumble
• refs
• official
• super
• bowl
• XLIII

[AJLambrecht]

@gf19711 yep i do agree that the steelers were the better team and did deserve to beat cardnals even if it wasnt a fumble they still would of lost

[gf19711]

@AJLambrecht Yet you don't hear anybody crying about the loss like a bunch of pussies. Refreshing, isn't it?

[AJLambrecht]

@toadman842 doesnt matter anymore that was back in 09 now the packers kicked the steelers ass

[yourpalal1227]

He's lying. That play wasn't reviewed. That was the tuck rule written all over it.

[toadman842]

HAHA people always looking for an excuse. You could nit pick about every fucking play in every fucking game. Get over it, stuoid Steeler haters.

[leaf1300]

@fretworx

This is football... anything can happen... look at this past year: desean punt return, garrard hail mary... 6 sec. left for one last throw, anything can happen... And you cant really see it from the view they have it, but he never lost control of the ball until his hand was moving forward: "Forward pass"

[chuckhowe]

@SuperTugz perhaps that's why you're a spectator and not a professional referee.

[chuckhowe]

@azrulz1993 inside of 2:00 minutes, the booth upstairs decides whether the play merits a more in depth review by the official on the field. being that this play resulted in a change of possession, the booth had plenty of time to review the play and decided that it did not merit any further review. was this the right call? i dunno, if i was a cardinal's fan i would have liked it to get a more in depth look. but i also don't think the call would have been overturned if it was taken to the field.

[Applelocal]

the ball came loose before hethrew it

[azrulz1993]

it was NOT reveiwed and that was why it was turned over. in a game full of c reviews, this wasnt. WHY WASNT IT?