YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

SpaceX CRS-1 Static Fire: 9/29/12

spacexchannel spacexchannel·101 videos
38,571
47,455
Like     Dislike 7

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like spacexchannel's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike spacexchannel's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add spacexchannel's video to your playlist.

Published on Sep 29, 2012

On September 29, 2012, SpaceX completed a successful static fire test of the Falcon 9 rocket's nine Merlin engines. During this test, SpaceX engineers ran through all countdown processes as if it were launch day. All nine engines fired at full power for two seconds while the rocket was held down to the pad. This is the last major all systems test in preparation for Falcon 9 and Dragon's next mission to the space station, targeted for October 7.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • Eay5paev

    I know some people will say that it's not exiting to see a static burn but I don't mind as far as I'm concerned. Please keep up on giving us updates on your progress like this.

    · 81

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Eay5paev's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Eay5paev's comment.
  • Michael Johnston

    It was a static fire to test engines, etc. It was flat on top because the Dragon capsule wasn't mounted for the test. I'm guessing it was just a cover to protect the interface.

    · 28

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Michael Johnston's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Michael Johnston's comment.
    in reply to DVA5656 (Show the comment)

All Comments (57)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • MrConservative608

    Read my comment again before asking dumb@ss questions. I am for the private sector. I am saying dumb@ss liberals will be be the dumb@ss problem if a company like SpaceX has an accident where people die, dumb@ss liberals will want to haul SpaceX executives before a dumb@ss US Senate panel to answer dumb@ss questions.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MrConservative608's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MrConservative608's comment.
    in reply to legohelicopter (Show the comment)
  • legohelicopter

    Calling yourself a Republican and not supporting the private sector? Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate legohelicopter's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate legohelicopter's comment.
    in reply to MrConservative608 (Show the comment)
  • JAD3N

    I guess I spoke too soon. It's almost 29k now.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JAD3N's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JAD3N's comment.
    in reply to MaDeR Levap (Show the comment)
  • MaDeR Levap

    Come on, it is not that bad. 25k for mere static fire test is for me rather good.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MaDeR Levap's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MaDeR Levap's comment.
    in reply to JAD3N (Show the comment)
  • Scott Arnell

    Actually the shuttles could and did do that, they just couldnt light the solids, however the shuttles were all static fired on a stack afew days before each one entered service. Search youtube for shuttle FRF videos.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Scott Arnell's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Scott Arnell's comment.
    in reply to GlanderBrondurg (Show the comment)
  • LucasKussowski

    SPACEX FTW - WOOT!!! :)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LucasKussowski's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LucasKussowski's comment.
  • GlanderBrondurg

    Most other companies test their engines prior to flight, but this is unusual compared to other companies so far as the entire rocket is sent through an entire launch sequence up to and including the engine ignition. Most other companies stop just before ignition.

    This works because SpaceX has clamps that hold the rocket onto the pad until the engines are at full thrust and the on-board computers give a green light for launch. The Space Shuttle, for instance, couldn't do that.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GlanderBrondurg's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GlanderBrondurg's comment.
    in reply to sae1095hc (Show the comment)
  • vidgami46

    I know, I just think it looks funny without the faring.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vidgami46's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vidgami46's comment.
    in reply to SquirrelFromGradLife (Show the comment)
  • SquirrelFromGradLife

    What top? The top fairing isn't installed.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate SquirrelFromGradLife's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate SquirrelFromGradLife's comment.
    in reply to vidgami46 (Show the comment)
  • bjcovertaction

    The "snow" is frozen moisture in the air. Falcon 9 uses liquid oxygen as a propellant oxidizer which is a cryogenic (very cold) liquid. When the vehicle tanks are filled with LOx, they get cold enough to condense and, eventually, freeze the water in the humid Florida air. The ice accumulates on the vehicle at first, but eventually sloughs off.

    You will see the same phenomenon happening in all vehicles that use cryogenic propellants.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bjcovertaction's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bjcovertaction's comment.
    in reply to dcoxen (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later