Star Wars meets Star Trek: Attack of the Drones (Part 1)

[Part 1]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HmB9VQdE3U

[Part 2]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oD2UqL_OjpI

[Part 3]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvZ0Ty5LMcE

In this stop-motion animated film, the worlds of Star Wars and Star Trek collide. The crew of the Enterprise D and the Rebel Alliance must join forces to stop their greatest foes' plan to destroy the Rebellion - and the Enterprise - once and for all.

Running at just over half an hour, this is one of my early brick films, (also called "LEGO movies") completed in 2005. If you like what you see, don't forget to subscribe and check out "The Making of Attack of the Drones:"

http://smeagol.110mb.com/makingof.htm

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• star
• wars
• meets
• vs.
• versus
• trek
• LEGO
• AOTD
• attack
• of
• the
• drones
• crossover
• cross
• over
• Picard
• Data
• Troi
• Worf
• Skywalker
• Darth
• Vader
• Borg
• Queen
• spoof
• parody
• animation
• animations
• stop-motion
• stop
• motion
• smeagol
• Philip
• Heinrich
• Unrenewable

[44448a]

SmeagolStudios, do you prefer star wars or star trek? I prefer star wars :D

[SmeagolStudios]

@44448a With the exception of the new film, I don't think Star Trek is generally in the same genre as Star Wars, they're pretty different. Star Wars is generally a little higher in raw entertainment value and of course production values, though I think Star Trek shows generally provide a little more to think about.

[TheWwematt2]

at 6:50 , is that a real head with eyebrows or is it animated?

[SmeagolStudios]

@TheWwematt2 I added the eyebrows in post.

[AdamHinckley]

The handle on the lightsaber is to small... o wait! Thats the dislike bar!

[onlypeaceindeath]

@onlypeaceindeath Fuck, i meant "12.75 billion gigawatts per".

[onlypeaceindeath]

@Idazmi7 Where? I only remember the "12.75 billion gigawatts of" and then he was interupted by something. It can mean anything. But since watt is power, and he used it as a unit of energy, really makes his estimate suspect. What if he meant per day? That would put the power at something like 150 terawatts, which is consistent with Rikers estimate.

[Idazmi7]

@onlypeaceindeath The total power of the Galaxy class, according to Data the Android, is 100 *million* gigawatts.

[onlypeaceindeath]

@Idazmi7 Which sounds like exaggeration. Wasn't light phasers in TNG rated at a few Gigawatts, and the total output of a Galaxy-class starship rated in the terawattage? Just saying.

[Idazmi7]

@onlypeaceindeath It was stated in the third that if they cut through the planet's SHIELD, they would obliterate the surface instantly.

[onlypeaceindeath]

@Idazmi7 Can't find the first one right now, and I can only find some remasterd pieces of the third, which didn't display that much in firepower. But the second one is not that impressive. No damage was visible, no bright lights, no real fireballs. Just some wierd atmospheric turbulence. Looked like some kind of lightning storm or something.

[Idazmi7]

@onlypeaceindeath

"Balance of terror" Proximity blast at 90,00km, easily gigatons

"Battle of the Omarion Nebula" Torpedoes vs planet

"Whom gods destory" Phasers vs planet

etc.. etc..

[onlypeaceindeath]

@Idazmi7 Proof please. Enterprise has failed to destroy an asteroid which was slightly denser than normal as i recall, they have shattered asteroids maybe a hundred meters in diameter with a single torpedo, and according to Riker in Pegasus I believe, it would take almost all of the Enterprise's torpedoes to destroy a dozen kilometer, hollow asteroid. Hardly continent crushing. Unlike Star Wars, where even a Star Destroyer's engines on max power would spell doom for all complex life on a planet.