Evolution is Fact, not just a theory.

Evolution fact not theory
People who don't believe evolution is a fact are ignorant arrogant people
who don't want to embrace nature. Instead they choose to believe in fairytales
that help them sleep at night.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Thunderfoot
• Evolution
• fact
• not
• theory
• People
• who
• don't
• believe
• evolution
• is
• are
• ignorant
• arrogant
• people
• want
• to
• embrace
• nature.
• Instead
• they
• choose
• in
• fairytales
• that
• help
• them
• sleep
• at
• night.
• Richard
• Dawkins
• god
• science
• atheism
• creationism
• funny
• idiot
• fundamentalism
• jesus
• dumb
• natural
• God
• satan
• fake

[rooio3]

@0Maloy1- certain protein complexes, implying that variations in mRNA decay rate play a functional possibly regulatory role. None of this disprove macro-evolution. Different mRNA isoforms have different stabilities and can have decay rates ranging over orders of magnitude.

[rooio3]

@0Maloy1- transitional species would be preserved. All fossils are in some sense a transitional form. No given fossil represents the absolute termination of an evolutionary path. "our species genetic code has been decaying"- most studies focused on measuring the fluctuations in steady-state mRNA concentrations, from which the separate contributions of synthesis and decay cannot be disentangled. Recent studies found that mRNA decay rates may differ by functional group or membership in

[rooio3]

@0Maloy1- Fossilization (taphonomy) itself is rare. The fossil record does not represent all of the living things once found on earth because it is dependent on many factors in order for the fossils to be preserved. Fossilization tends not to favor geographically restricted and geologically ephemeral organisms, & transitional species tend to have short duration and narrow geographical range. So it is unlikely many

[0Maloy1]

@rooio3 replacement species. While some of this can be attributed to humanity, the sheer amount of it can not.On genetics, I don't know about other species. But our species genetic code has been decaying. An example is that in ancient times it would have been possible for inter-family mating, as their was not a need for a different one to supplement for inconsistencies. I don't think it would be decaying as such if macro-evolution were true.

[0Maloy1]

@rooio3 Well, we actually have plenty of fossils, especially during many of the catastrophic events that struck the Earth. Not to mention in some species during mid-evolution would be completely obsolete and would be incapable of surviving. Such as the Rat transitioning to the Bat. It needs its feet to roost, but, transitioning between the two species, when it would have those feet it would be incapable of surviving. Also, the destruction of countless species and some phylum, without.......

[grezidue]

Evolution is theory not fact. A theory isn't an educated guess its an explanation on how things work. In science a fact is merely a data point.

[rooio3]

@0Maloy1- Fossils are rare occurrences, so you won't find all fossils of every organism. Only those that have been properly preserved. There have been transitional fossils found for some organisms, and not much for others. And fossils only give you snap shots in time. They won't morph in front of your eyes. The strongest evidence is in the study of genetics within the field of biology. where they can uncover the mechanisms of this process on a molecular level.

[rooio3]

@0Maloy1-Macro evolution is the same process as micro. The only difference is time span. The same genetic changes are occurring. Evolution is simply change in gene pool....over time, whether it's micro or macro. These genetic changes can affect the structure of an organism. Lungs, limbs, eyes, size, so on, develop for specific selective purposes. But these are all due to genetic changes that affect how an organism develop and grow. The evidence would be in genetics.

[0Maloy1]

@rooio3 First in this case you have to change the lungs, and the way the creatures takes in oxygen. Then you have to alter enzymes and the different gases this creature is capable of breathing in along with oxygen. You also have to change the outside of the body so, it can move on land easier. There is much more too it, but I am no professional. Either way, there is a noticeable lack of transitional evidence for macro-evolution.(again I apologize on how long I took to respond)

[0Maloy1]

@rooio3 Sorry, for taking so long to respond. Micro, evolution is a small change in a species. Such as skin color or hair texture. No matter how many times you change a dogs hair texture or how many canines it has, its still a dog. Macro-evolution is a large change, such as going from a under-water life form to a land-based one. This is actually much more complicated then it appears just to change that one thing, continuing in another comment.