looks awesome, only things I would comment on is the pool water being too static and lacking caustics and transparency in both interior and exterior shots and that the wooden terrace on the last shot is way too reflective for the kind of material its made of. (and way too high bokeh effect early on but that's just a personal preference)
Either way it looks much better than the majority of the "professional" architectural design and visualization studios that brag around the net.
that's a great work, no doubt, but there still seems something wrong with the daylight, e.g. at 0:57. maybe just to white and constant... same for the exterior.
the cam movements are a little (i say a LITTLE, not much) unbalanced, i.e. to 'computerized'.
i pretty much like the dof, though here and there a bit disproportionate, referring to the assumed size of the house and the 'lense' with which it is meant to be 'filmed'...
What program did you use to model? I use archicad and the end product is not as good as this. This is too incredible! So realistic.
ejoan279 2 weeks ago
just great.
whereismyface1 1 month ago
how long did it take to render this final copy?
jonray107 4 months ago
looks awesome, only things I would comment on is the pool water being too static and lacking caustics and transparency in both interior and exterior shots and that the wooden terrace on the last shot is way too reflective for the kind of material its made of. (and way too high bokeh effect early on but that's just a personal preference)
Either way it looks much better than the majority of the "professional" architectural design and visualization studios that brag around the net.
Talavaj 5 months ago
I need help on the materials how to you make them so realistic ?
ITaIRGeTI 5 months ago
what're beautiful and real
kxxx1008 7 months ago
@MELANIJA995 alienware is enough
AfterD34TH 7 months ago
for somethimg like this you need extremly awesome PC!
MELANIJA995 10 months ago
My God, awesome !!
MATIK750 1 year ago
that's a great work, no doubt, but there still seems something wrong with the daylight, e.g. at 0:57. maybe just to white and constant... same for the exterior.
the cam movements are a little (i say a LITTLE, not much) unbalanced, i.e. to 'computerized'.
i pretty much like the dof, though here and there a bit disproportionate, referring to the assumed size of the house and the 'lense' with which it is meant to be 'filmed'...
martinwettig 1 year ago