Hannes Alfvén, Plasma and Electromagnetism in Space

Hannes Alfven, Kristian Birkeland

www.plasmacosmology.net
www.thunderbolts.info
www.plasmauniverse.com

Astronomy Plasma Cosmology Electric Universe Astrophysics Nobel Prize winners Wal Thornhill Dave Talbott Anthony Peratt Halton Arp Charles Bruce Eric Lerner Red Shift Redshift Big Bang Thunderbolts of The Gods Electricity in space The Universe Cosmos Empiricism Real science

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Hannes
• Alfven
• plasma
• cosmology
• electric
• universe
• astronomy
• electromagnetism

[ammasdevotee]

you might want to examine Tesla.

[soupdragon42]

@ammasdevotee See my Tesla video

[petriedishxscapee]

how could the universe possibly be considered neutral? Even in the closet? I'm not educated but I read alot... sound therapy has demonstrated ; to me, everything is energy ... frequency... thoughts, emotions..totally completely charged. how could all that exist in a neutral environment.....What's your take on Tom Bearden? Love your music selections.

[soupdragon42]

Well, mainstream astronomy prefers to ignore the role of electricity as this might mess-up their pretty equations

Tom Bearden's work sounds interesting. I will check it out

[marneedear]

sigh

The elegant beauty of Alfven's work and mind are intoxicating.

[marneedear]

There is no clandestine conspiracy at work. All of human development has suffered these kinds of problems. It's the very nature of the marketplace of ideas -- a self-reinforcing system. I vaguely remember a Nobel Prize having gone out to work done in this area of Economics about 6 years ago... Just sayin.

[mujaku]

Let's face it, science really can't describe plasma - and when it tries to do so, out comes bullshit. For starters, plasma is neither matter nor energy.

[mujaku]

Of course it never dawned on Einstein and his minions that the universe is altogether electrical. His followers, to this day, still refuse to acknowledge that plasma is neither matter nor energy. In fact, it could be said the matter and energy are convenient fictions of Einstein and his thralls who have only succeeded in mathematizing metaphysical speculation otherwise called cosmology.

[Lake387]

@mrkontra  Would you elaborate on this subject. As I have followed experiments on free energy circuits and have had good success. They actrually work.

[Lake387]

@soupdragon42 ya Tom Bearden is intense. He has a new website. Its chenere something. but google definitely has it.

[katesisco]

good & effective---If we take this info and logically apply it in an all inclusive form to our Milky Way, we get currents inflowing in a spiral manner from both arms of the galaxy, being stored from the center outward until the storage coil is so charged it cannot hold more, then the center AGN (plasma focus) activates and discharges all at once in the form of two opposite jets.

The storage of charge compresses all, heliospheres and matter. We experience this compression in 5,000 y repeats.

[nickharvey7]

There is a link between electrical potential and future potential of the observer within their own reference frame. As the wave function continuously collapses and reforms electric charge move relative to the collapse. We see and feel this continuous alternating between wave and particle as the continuous flow of time. Just like the tick tock, tick tock of a clock the continuous wave particle, wave particle represents the physical flow of time itself!

[SteveOSpielberg]

the electric currents on the diagram look like crop circles!

[Liozeris]

Dumb distracting and stupid soundtrack, spoils a good visual.

[CACBCCCU]

If you plot -cos(x)/x*x (you can replace x with sqrt[x*x+y*y] for a 3-d plot) and position the ring of a ring galaxy at the radius of the 2nd minima of this hypothetical permanent, galactic-core-defined gravitational potential wave-well that's "permanent " in the sense that it doesn't oscillate over time at any point in space, but oscillates in space instead. The idea is to give the graviton a wavelength and to consider the galactic core as a dominant coherent source of phase-0 gravitons.

[CACBCCCU]

The steady-state quantum gravity rule I'd use multiplies GmM/r^2 (Newton) by cos(kr), where k (in radians) = 2pi/[d(p)/Fp(G/EM)], where d(p)=~10^-15m is corrected proton diameter and Fp(G/EM)=~10^-36 is the ratio of gravitational to electromagnetic forces between two motionless protons. This gives one wavecycle (2pi radians) per ~10^21 meters, around 60K LY, which is maybe about the radius of Hoag's ring, the Sombrero's ring and the MW galaxy.