JFK's revenge part 1- the Zapruder film was altered

An analysis of the JFK asassination footage known as the Zapruder film

Addendum: Some of you are like the south end of a north-bound mule. The film is FAKE. It is a composite. Take the figures of people and freeze and rotate them and they do not match up to the video taken from the reverse angle - which only shows the car speeding away. The fake film also contradicts corroborating eyewitness testimony, the grass looks like astro-turf, the plaza was not blocked off and there were actually 3 times as many people there watching than shown in the "film" and the people further away are actually larger than people closer to the supposed camera, i.e. a "composite". do-you-get-it?

A few quick points;
- There were shots, diversionary shots and blanks being fired from everywhere, including the knoll. That is probably why some people cling to the idea that some sort of "kill" shot was fired from there.
- The street sign in the film is fake. It does not appear in any of the other research videos, I never saw it when I went there and Abraham Zapruder never mentions it in his testimony. It's also out of perspective.
- I think the driver "appears" to have a gun or even fire a shot because there was a "jump cut" at that moment (there may never have been a handgun in the car at all). I can't say for sure what his involvement was but I am certain he slammed on the brakes.
- The idea of a trunk weapon is plausible, but I have no idea what it could have been or how it worked. I think it's more likely that the shot came from the area of the mooreman/muchmore characters in this fake film. However, 8 people in Dealy plaza testified that they saw Kennedy's FOOT sticking out of the limo over the door: which means whatever delivered the headshot drove him foreward possibly to the limo floor. (those 8 people were bead by '64)

Jackie was DEFINATELY trying to get out of the car. I think it looks like she's reaching for something because she has something in her hand already. What exactly is anyones guess (It's not a piece of his brain, that's just dumb).
*Pay attention to the grill on the limo. It changes shape after emerging from behind the phoney highway sign.*
1) the limo has a different grill when it emerges from the fake road sign. 2) the road sign IS fake; and the perspective is all wrong. 3) the cops on motorcycles are twice as big as the motorcycles. 4) the crowd number more than doubles in size on the corner of dealy (houston) and elm in less than 2.4 seconds. 5) the distace to the people on the lawn is disperportionate to the people in the car, (ie objects farther away were actually larger in the film.) 6) the film as manufactured, thats the point. 7) Who owns time life? (they had the best opportunity and equipment to fake video at that time)
8) There are no witnesses to Zapruder even filming the event (including photo and video) He is just a cog in the wheel of the official story which is bogus. 9) the supposed photo evidence of zapruder filming shows three different men standing in 3 different places. 10) the photos and the video are entirely different and out of sync. Most of the photos from the reverse angle show a predominantly afro-american female crowd on the sidewalk, this "film" does not. 11) Sorry agent man. Unless you happen to be OJ Simpson, you're not catching a moving car, unless it stops. Which it did.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• JFK
• zapruder
• 9/11
• fake
• conspiracy
• noplanes
• bush
• iraq
• federal
• government
• public
• service
• announcements
• illuminati
• nonprofit
• nwo

[JimmyMac3486]

If you believe that this could be done in 1963 you're more of an idiot than the guy who made this video. Think about the technology it would take to perfectly mask out the limosine, enlarge the background, and "re-time" everything. This idiot doesn't even know what re-timing is. Buster Keaton was a master of masking and re-timing and even his work doesn't reflect mastery of this level. I think the JFK assassination was a conspiracy, but this idea is ridiculous

[thePRfirm]

@JimmyMac3486

It's simple composite layering. You know absolutely nothing about film. Your examples are not even in the right context. You are an idiot AND a shill. As per usual, another smart-mouth stupid ass oakie who did not address any of the points in the video description. typical.

[JgarfbiHoover]

@thePRfirm "The street sign in the film is fake"

Oliver Stone went to great lengths to get the 'Stemmons Frwy' signage back to it's original position. Luckily they found the two holes w/conc. in them so 'THEY' could position it back into it's right place. You're a kook alright, but keep up the good work you provide the nessessary canon fodder for Lone Nut advocates to declare "Conspiracy Literature/Vid's constitutes the largest body of fraudulent work ever created on any one given subject !

[thePRfirm]

@JgarfbiHoover

You should stop trying to be clever. No one knows what the fuck you are talking about and nobdy cares. The sign is a layered composite of a sign that was there at one time. It's a moot point because The whole thing is manufactured. It's interesting how shills always reference the street sign and no other points made. You must all live together in the same shit-hole.

[redvoltaire]

@thePRfirm Don't forget to tell them that the lamppost on the Zapruder side of the road moves in sync with the background, from 0:50 to 0:51. Please study this. Objects in the foreground should move faster than objects in the background. To me, this is the absolute smoking gun that this film has been altered. It's unbelievable how badly we've all been played.

[drewzillasaurusrex]

The large bystanders and the lurching passengers are the most compellling explanations for the film being altered. The rest of your explanation seems rather ambiguous to me but I'll soak up more when I watch this vid again. Why would somebody want to alter the film? Treasury notes.

[MrNzzo]

You all sound like smart people, I on the oyher hand am just an average joe, one thing I know is that if you put your hand on my back and push I will move forward, if you put your hand on my chest and push I will move backwards and if you put your hand on my right shoulder and push I will move to the left or opposite direction, simple physics, as far as I'm concerned that's all I need to know !

[Scottthefish]

is it possible that the braking limousine is a result of the driver reacting to the bullet that hit the windshield or other shots from the front?

[MOXWELLDIAMOND]

I'm not really believing the whole video alteration that far back. I work as a compositor creating special effects, altering video for one of the most successful studios in the U.S. At this time video alteration was extremely difficult, and any attempts would be highly noticeable. All frames before and after the shot are fluent and have no alteration. I do believe there was a conspiracy and multiple shooters though. I think this video shows the fatal shot clearly came from the grassy knoll.

[theddrmaster]

If you can explain to me why the REFLECTIONS in the limousine are consistent with the bystanders and such, then you'll be a huge step closer to convincing me at least. The reflections would stop moving if the car were to stop at all. A composite wouldn't affect the reflections either.

Those people looking behind the limousine were looking for where the shot that pierced his neck came from. But I'm willing to have a civilized debate over it, and I'll change my opinion if someone convinces me. :)

[WTCnucleardemolition]

Google "The FBI uses polygraphs to eliminate suspects"

[animatetime]

You are falling into the trap of looking at the film in isolation. There are several films of the assassination and they all show the same things. This is where you would need to find discrepancies, not chasing ghosts in the Z film.

[FRTothus]

These are not the only examples of 'doctoring'. Keep up the good work. I might mention that the 'clutching at his throat' movement is no such thing. A close look will reveal arms akimbo, forearms rotating, hands in fists, entirely consistent with damage to the spinal column. Albeit not fakery, it shows the power of suggestion that lies in the cover story, and shows, I think, how few are really paying attention. The 1963 coup echos to this day.

[jimgiunta]

The technology did in fact exist back then. The technology that existed back then would boggle the mind. Optics and film were so good they could take a picture from outerspace with a resolution on the ground of a few feet, meaning you could see items only a few feet in length on the ground. Editing a film wouldn't have been a problem at all. The CIA and Kodak were in bed together on a number of joint ventures surrounding film, optics and the ability to enhance images.

[quiettype609]

Trust me the gov and military always has technology way beyond what the public has and it takes 10 years later before they give it to use to use-besides the video where secret service boss tell his guy not to ride on back of car and he waves his arms up 3 times like why dont u want me on the back-because he would block view