@segano1 wow, are you still on? And this is the thanks we get for giving you an identity and culture? No wonder you're not fit to govern yourselves! Less of the Buckfast las!
@TheEyesOFsilence Con't...the SCOTTI and REGULI, as being SYNONOMOUS EQUIVALENT TERMS; and adding, generally, to the name SCOTTUS, that of REGULUS or NOBILIS; whereas he NEVER calls the native Irish anything but HIBERIONOE, as being the COMMON and ORDINARY PEOPLE. - Vol. 11.Ward D. Laing, Edinburgh. 1828.Pp. 4-5.
So you see, Scots came from Caledonia/ALBA/Scotland and partly conquered Hibernia/Érin/Ireland as a military ruling aristocracy class, the same way the Normans did to England in 1066.
@TheEyesOFsilence Joseph Ritson, in the 'Annals of the Caledonians/Picts/Scots', also notes this distinction amongst the Irish:
The distinction between these two nations [Hiberni and Scots] is manifested in an ancient treatise, written by saint Patrick, and entitled his "Confession" or "Apology," in which the SCOTTI, as being the conquerors, masters, and MILITARY MEN, appear as the NOBILITY, or gentry; FILII SCOTTORUM ET FILII REGULORUM; which he repeats, joining, in both places,
"St Patrick often uses SCOTI and REGULI as equivalent terms. To the term SCOTTUS he adds often the word NOBILIS; whereas he has no other appellative for the NATIVE IRISH but HYBERIONE, or HYBERNIGENAE, THE COMMON PEOPLE." (History of the Scottish Nation, fn. p. 282).
McNair states that such names as IBER, EBER, HEBER, EBORNES, and HIBERONES, are all words designating the ancestor HEBER - from whom the HEBREWS have all descended.
Similarly, Dr.Wylie mentions that there were TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLES dwelling in Ireland - the HIBERNI and SCOTI. There was a MARKED DISTINCTION between the two.
"The SCOTS ARE THE MILITARY CLASS;THEY ARE THE NOBLES... The latter [the Hiberni] are spoken of as the COMMONALITY the, sons of the soil" (History of the Scottish Nation, Vol. L, p. 281).
@TheEyesOFsilence Dr. Moore, in his History of Ireland, notes a CLEAR DISTINCTION:
"It is indeed evident that those persons to whom St Patrick applies the name SCOTS, were all of THE HIGH AND DOMINANT CLASS; whereas, when speaking of THE GREAT BULK OF THE PEOPLE, he calls them HIBERIONACES, - from the name Hiberione, which is always applied by him to the island itself." (P. 72).
'Scot' and 'Gael' were synonymous terms before the 16th century, when the Irish Romanists re-wrote history in response to the reformation, Scotland avoided the worst of it because of the glorious Scottish reformation.
So it never was an Irish language, Irish is a 16th century Papist name imposed by Pope Leo X in the 16th century.
Truth is that Ireland was the land of Scots (partially) but Scotland was never the land of Irish.
0:24 - that's in my town, hahahaha!
tranquilnightmares 1 day ago
@segano1 wow, are you still on? And this is the thanks we get for giving you an identity and culture? No wonder you're not fit to govern yourselves! Less of the Buckfast las!
boru1982 4 days ago
@TheEyesOFsilence Con't...the SCOTTI and REGULI, as being SYNONOMOUS EQUIVALENT TERMS; and adding, generally, to the name SCOTTUS, that of REGULUS or NOBILIS; whereas he NEVER calls the native Irish anything but HIBERIONOE, as being the COMMON and ORDINARY PEOPLE. - Vol. 11.Ward D. Laing, Edinburgh. 1828.Pp. 4-5.
So you see, Scots came from Caledonia/ALBA/Scotland and partly conquered Hibernia/Érin/Ireland as a military ruling aristocracy class, the same way the Normans did to England in 1066.
segano1 4 days ago
@TheEyesOFsilence Joseph Ritson, in the 'Annals of the Caledonians/Picts/Scots', also notes this distinction amongst the Irish:
The distinction between these two nations [Hiberni and Scots] is manifested in an ancient treatise, written by saint Patrick, and entitled his "Confession" or "Apology," in which the SCOTTI, as being the conquerors, masters, and MILITARY MEN, appear as the NOBILITY, or gentry; FILII SCOTTORUM ET FILII REGULORUM; which he repeats, joining, in both places,
.....Con't...
segano1 4 days ago
@TheEyesOFsilence Dr.Wylie goes on to say:
"St Patrick often uses SCOTI and REGULI as equivalent terms. To the term SCOTTUS he adds often the word NOBILIS; whereas he has no other appellative for the NATIVE IRISH but HYBERIONE, or HYBERNIGENAE, THE COMMON PEOPLE." (History of the Scottish Nation, fn. p. 282).
McNair states that such names as IBER, EBER, HEBER, EBORNES, and HIBERONES, are all words designating the ancestor HEBER - from whom the HEBREWS have all descended.
segano1 4 days ago
@TheEyesOFsilence Con't...
Similarly, Dr.Wylie mentions that there were TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLES dwelling in Ireland - the HIBERNI and SCOTI. There was a MARKED DISTINCTION between the two.
"The SCOTS ARE THE MILITARY CLASS;THEY ARE THE NOBLES... The latter [the Hiberni] are spoken of as the COMMONALITY the, sons of the soil" (History of the Scottish Nation, Vol. L, p. 281).
segano1 4 days ago
@TheEyesOFsilence Dr. Moore, in his History of Ireland, notes a CLEAR DISTINCTION:
"It is indeed evident that those persons to whom St Patrick applies the name SCOTS, were all of THE HIGH AND DOMINANT CLASS; whereas, when speaking of THE GREAT BULK OF THE PEOPLE, he calls them HIBERIONACES, - from the name Hiberione, which is always applied by him to the island itself." (P. 72).
segano1 4 days ago
@TheEyesOFsilence Ogham inscriptions were Greek you dumb cunt.
'Scot' and 'Gael' were synonymous terms before the 16th century, when the Irish Romanists re-wrote history in response to the reformation, Scotland avoided the worst of it because of the glorious Scottish reformation.
So it never was an Irish language, Irish is a 16th century Papist name imposed by Pope Leo X in the 16th century.
Truth is that Ireland was the land of Scots (partially) but Scotland was never the land of Irish.
segano1 4 days ago