I once believed (when making this video) that Luke side was Mary side and Matthew was Joseph's side however I believe the truth lies in this video link below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3bsAMyRwbw
This video is to show the mathematical possibility of the truth in Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour, it is not pure factual only serves as purpose to show a possibility.
Speak to God ask for his guidance in seeking the truth.
http://www.pgfracing.com
God bless
The two genealogies are ahistorical, obfuscations. The genealogies are NOT separate bloodlines & Luke makes no claim to be a bloodline of Mary. The two form ONE genealogy that weaves into and out of each other. It is a matter of correlating them as one to the scientific data instead of vainly looking for evidence to support an obfuscation when the historical & archeological evidence is overwhelmingly against it. The truth is that biblical chronology is FALSE and, purposely, misleading.
bondurango 2 years ago
If it were about the math, you'd be right, but it's not. The genealogy listed in Matthew doesn't match with the genealogy in the Old Testament. He skips names.
chrispalasz 2 years ago
Average age, only 200 years ago, was in the 30 to 40s.
An average age of 38 years would be highly suspect.
Regardless of this, the accuracy of record keeping MUST be questioned. Most of the authors of the bible never claimed to be inspired by God to write anything.
In fact, those that did suggest such things, were not included in the official bible ( such as the book of Enoch ).
An old book with some truth, some lies, some good lessons, some bad ones. Very human in origin.
Missing data.
looncraz 2 years ago
pgf - You can also try googling "jewish lineage adopted children" - Under books(dot)google(dot)ca, you will find an article called
"A handbook for the Jewish Home", under Jewish lineage which outlines the guidelines for adopted children, you will find that an adopted child always follows the lineage of his biological father and not his adopted father.
Matthew1944 3 years ago
pgf - "unless you have two YouTube accounts"
Same household, pgf.
Matthew1944 3 years ago
pgf - "I'm not familiar with the march to town of the dead saints"
Matthew 27:52 and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised;
Matthew 27:53 and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many.
Cited source:
1. outreachjudaism(dot)org/mary(dot)html
2. torahatlanta(dot)com/articles/Problems%20with%20Jesus'%20Lineage(dot)htm
3. geocities(dot)com/paulntobin/genealogy(dot)html
Matthew1944 3 years ago
Was referring to Matthew's comments about the quoting unless you have two YouTube accounts LoraSinger. God bless
pgfracing 3 years ago
One cited source would be good. Matthew1944 has not provided one site or source for an original Torah. If you have no information to base your statements off, you have almost 0. I'm not familiar with the march to town of the dead saints, so I can't offer a reply one way or the other today, Lord willing in the future. God bless
pgfracing 3 years ago
pgf - "Your comments are without citing sources".
How many sites do you need to read to consider it as being as a cited source?
"If you want to convince someone to change their mind"
I really don't care if you change your mind,pg, because I know that against all information and fact, you will choose to believe a story which amounts to a fairy tale.
By the way, what about the march to town of the dead saints - No reply?
LoraSinger 3 years ago
pgf - "When quoting someone it would be good to actually quote them."
I wasn't quoting anyone, pgf.
"If you remove the important information I put such as; for life or death it changes the meaning completely"
Your "important information" is simply a belief system, one of many in the world and NOT the only one, no better or worse than the others.
LoraSinger 3 years ago