@Hungaroctonul This case is same as I say "the sky is blue", what you confute that "no, because shit stinks, because the Chinese chicken serve with sauce".
But even you are saying these lots yada-yada, the sky remains blue...
Plethora of facts prove that olahs nothing but a big-stink-nothing to do with Transylvania. I showed below some of these in the last week. Then comes the yada-yada. U didnt refute no any fact what I mentioned, and these documents and facts show, there is no any olah in Transylvania until we Hungarians invite u in our Fairyland. I dont care what town u have in the Mars or where whine your gods. We talk about Transylvania, do u understand?!
I line up dry-facts for u, repeatedly and continuously, without stopping (and can go on). Not only now, but 2-3 days before! Don't despair if you don't know any facts to support your blabla, romanian historians have failed it so far.
I just ask you to ponder this once in your quiet solitude, maybe your teachers said really lots, clear untruth in your school.
From the 271. Roman's withdrawal to the next 1000 years there are no any document to mentions any (daco)roman people in Transylvania. There was first mentioned only in 1210. with the Vlachs (shepherd people). The "hated" Romans lived in Transylvania only 170 years, which isnt enough for nation formation effect (the French, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese people needed it 3-400 years of development, and sure it is full peace co-existence result!)
let alone against the constantly-resistant, freedom fighting, rebelled Dacian people. Anywhere, there are no similar precedent in the human history, what u spoke about! Just look at Trajan's Column! King Decebalt committed suicide rather than yield to the Romans. Again, in Transylvania via 1000 years no any Code doesn't mention any Romanian people, as opposed to the Byzantine chronicles from Kedrenosz's has already mentioned the Blachs in the Balkans in the 10th century.
The Vlach origins from the balcan indicate that they have no any Old Germanic word origin, meanwhile some Goths, Gepids lived in Transylvania too! In contrast to other Romance language, wich there are plenty of old-germanic derived word forms!
But let us take the linguistics, which is clincher of the stranger and carpet-bagger Vlachs: there are 511 -still existing- settlements in the 13 century charters, with 428 names of Hungarian origin, in contrast to the 3(!) Romanian. In the 14 century, this ratio is 641/36. Ardea is also the romanian translation of Erdély (Transylvania in Hungarian) similar as the rivers' name there.
@mazareanu1 OMG pls dont hurt me! lol
If u cant say nothing opposite the truths, it always coming: I kill u bozgor! lol sheepfuckers
Magor78 2 weeks ago
@Magor78 Our people will eradicate your people before we let you take OUR Transylvania back.
mazareanu1 3 weeks ago
@Hungaroctonul This case is same as I say "the sky is blue", what you confute that "no, because shit stinks, because the Chinese chicken serve with sauce".
But even you are saying these lots yada-yada, the sky remains blue...
Magor78 1 month ago
@Hungaroctonul Just the usual..
Plethora of facts prove that olahs nothing but a big-stink-nothing to do with Transylvania. I showed below some of these in the last week. Then comes the yada-yada. U didnt refute no any fact what I mentioned, and these documents and facts show, there is no any olah in Transylvania until we Hungarians invite u in our Fairyland. I dont care what town u have in the Mars or where whine your gods. We talk about Transylvania, do u understand?!
That's it.
Magor78 1 month ago
@Hungaroctonul
Ohh, I almost forgot it!
/watch?v=pZzL7bQANTM
Magor78 1 month ago
@Hungaroctonul
Final comments, see below five!
I line up dry-facts for u, repeatedly and continuously, without stopping (and can go on). Not only now, but 2-3 days before! Don't despair if you don't know any facts to support your blabla, romanian historians have failed it so far.
I just ask you to ponder this once in your quiet solitude, maybe your teachers said really lots, clear untruth in your school.
Magor78 1 month ago
@Hung FIRST
Some questions(again):
From the 271. Roman's withdrawal to the next 1000 years there are no any document to mentions any (daco)roman people in Transylvania. There was first mentioned only in 1210. with the Vlachs (shepherd people). The "hated" Romans lived in Transylvania only 170 years, which isnt enough for nation formation effect (the French, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese people needed it 3-400 years of development, and sure it is full peace co-existence result!)
Magor78 1 month ago
@Hung II.
let alone against the constantly-resistant, freedom fighting, rebelled Dacian people. Anywhere, there are no similar precedent in the human history, what u spoke about! Just look at Trajan's Column! King Decebalt committed suicide rather than yield to the Romans. Again, in Transylvania via 1000 years no any Code doesn't mention any Romanian people, as opposed to the Byzantine chronicles from Kedrenosz's has already mentioned the Blachs in the Balkans in the 10th century.
Magor78 1 month ago
@Hungaroctonul III-B
The Vlach origins from the balcan indicate that they have no any Old Germanic word origin, meanwhile some Goths, Gepids lived in Transylvania too! In contrast to other Romance language, wich there are plenty of old-germanic derived word forms!
Magor78 1 month ago
@Hungaroctonul III-A.
But let us take the linguistics, which is clincher of the stranger and carpet-bagger Vlachs: there are 511 -still existing- settlements in the 13 century charters, with 428 names of Hungarian origin, in contrast to the 3(!) Romanian. In the 14 century, this ratio is 641/36. Ardea is also the romanian translation of Erdély (Transylvania in Hungarian) similar as the rivers' name there.
Magor78 1 month ago