Chris Wallace interviews Jon Stewart (transparent edits) Part 2

The parts of this interview that were cut for the televised version have been slightly dimmed so you can easily see what was taken out and what was left in.

• Category

  News & Politics

[itsian44]

i would watch an episode of a show where Chris Wallace watches an entire episode of South Park.

[Dani Smythe]

I could watch this over and over. Trying to undermine his credibility (as a satirical comedian...) using a Pam Anderson roast from the freaking comedy network. I can't get over how razor sharp John Stewart is sometimes.

[youasked4it2]

Why aren't ALL interviews made available on ALL news networks.... I think the edited clip vs the unedited clip proves Jon Stewart's point of Fox being biased. Did Fox provide the full unedited interview on their website? How was this interview obtained? Did Fox edit this interview to show the edited sections vs. the aired sections? I don't know the source.. I do know.. this makes them look bad. I'm not being biased, I'm looking at the facts which is HOW the interview was edited.

[TheSleepingLionRoars]

Huge difference in the unedited earlier recordings floating around.

[Jhonathan Villeda]

Wallace is completely lost in this entire interview, at the beginning his point of the interview was to prove to Stewart that other news is biased, then switches it to saying john is trying to be a politically involved. then in the end he says that the point of the interview was just to understand Stewart.

[Pedro Lopez]

What happen in 5.15? Censured? And Why? because is traditional in Fox news

[bcalath]

chris wallace stood no chance trying to play a game of words with jon stewart

[Melvin Ang]

Very blatant editing from Fox.

[VitalSigns1288]

I like how at around 5:15 they cut it so John says he is pushing a liberal bias.

[Illumirage]

Pretty sure that was a partisan jab.

[Illumirage]

Who is Bob Nietzsche? And why would I read an article that a liberal told me about, probably written by a liberal, to deflect criticism away from Liberals? Honestly?

Even if the study was flawed, the percentage is still higher than it should be. And I'm not basing my opinion on that study, my opinion was made long before I read that.

[Mark Paolotti]

Dude. Read BobNietzsche's reply. As he explains, that study you are basing your opinion on was very inaccurate.