Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

"Seven is Exploding"

In April 2007, Italian TV broadcasted a definite proof that Building 7 was demolished by explosives. For the rest of the series, go to luogocomune.net  
 
Customize

More From: luogocomune

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
1,305 ratings
Sign in to rate
353,454 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (8,317)   Options

Loading...
Joefreiheit (5 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Many buildings have been hit by planes and they didnt collapse in on themselves and many buildings have burned and have never feel in on themselves like the WTC buildings did on 9/11. It is an obvious demolition job. Don't let the shills tell you otherwise.
PoetryHound (16 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Steel structured buildings have never in history collapsed in on themselves"

So nothing can happen if it's never happened before, eh? That's pretty stupid logic.

"like what happened to all 3 wtc buildings"

Did you forget the planes? Duhhhhh. Oh, what possible harm could come from fuel-laden jets used as missiles?

I think the conspiracy tards are getting even dumber with time.
Joefreiheit (18 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Steel structured buildings have never in history collapsed in on themselves like what happened to all 3 wtc buildings in NYCity on 9/11 unless it was a demolition job. There have been many buildings that were hit by aircraft and many buildings that have burned and none of them fell like the WTC buildings. The WTC buildings were controlled demolition jobs.
PoetryHound (20 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
In the real world, buildings collapse all different ways. I don't need an unemployed steam pipefitter like KevinJerck lecturing me about highrise structural engineering.

I know, I know. That's what the conspiracy kooks do - pretend to be experts in structural engineering, experts in fire safety protection, experts in metallurgy, experts in physics, etc. Meanwhile, they claim all the folks who really ARE experts in these fields are liars. Sure. Makes perfect sense.
KevinMerck (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
In the real world, any collapse of building 7 would have been a partial collapse in the direction of the damaged area.

The worst case scenario for 1 and 2 would have been a partial collapse at the point of impact leaving the rest of the building standing.

There is no way on God's green earth that they could have collapsed at near free-fall speed through the path of greatest resistance without the use of controlled demolition.

That would be *strictly impossible*.
PoetryZound (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Anyone who examines the facts in a calm and rational manner will realize that the firemen who said WTC 7 was unstable were lying. I hate to say the firefighters were part of the plot, but if they were correct about the building's instability, that would undermine the whole inside job conspiracy theory and we can't have that happen.
KevinMerck (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
People interested in the truth don't care if the perpetrators were Jewish, Catholic, Islamist, Buddhists or atheists.

People interested in the truth don't care if the perpetrators were white, black, yellow or brown.

Reasonable people want justice regardless of the religious, racial makeup or national origin of the perpetrators.
Joefreiheit (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
9/11
Joefreiheit (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
WAS AN
Joefreiheit (2 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
INSIDE

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.