Identify Gartley 222 and Butterfly Patterns using Fibonacci 2 of 2.
Loading...
7,083
Loading...
Uploader Comments (KingKaiTrunks)
see all
All Comments (7)
-
What about the B. Carney suggests in his book that an ideal butterfly must have a 78.6 B of XA.
-
You use a 200% extention of XA? I've never heard that can be used? Do you have any stats on it?
-
@KingKaiTrunks King, what are accurate of this patterns?
-
Great videos. Where can I find your "thread", or blog or forum?
I'd love to learn more!
Thanks
-
Thanks a bunch money bags. Been following you on babypips. Really appreciate your contribution. Johnnypipster.
-
thanks again money bags
-
Since BC retraces to.382 you treat it as a butterfly instead of a gartley. You picked D at the convergence of 1.272 XA with 2.00 CD. Did you do that only because it's the only qualifying convergence point for it to be a butterfly?
Loading...
That and because of the fact that a pattern can not be considered a butterfly until it passes the 1.000 of XA and retraces from at least the 1.272 (a butterfly is the retracement of price from the extensions of XA).
KingKaiTrunks 2 years ago