Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Identify Gartley 222 and Butterfly Patterns using Fibonacci 2 of 2.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,083
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 23, 2009

How to Identify Gartley and Butterfly Patterns in a market 2 of 2.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (KingKaiTrunks)

  • That and because of the fact that a pattern can not be considered a butterfly until it passes the 1.000 of XA and retraces from at least the 1.272 (a butterfly is the retracement of price from the extensions of XA).

see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What about the B. Carney suggests in his book that an ideal butterfly must have a 78.6 B of XA.

  • You use a 200% extention of XA? I've never heard that can be used? Do you have any stats on it?

  • @KingKaiTrunks King, what are accurate of this patterns?

  • Great videos. Where can I find your "thread", or blog or forum?

    I'd love to learn more!

    Thanks

  • Thanks a bunch money bags. Been following you on babypips. Really appreciate your contribution. Johnnypipster.

  • thanks again money bags

  • Since BC retraces to.382 you treat it as a butterfly instead of a gartley. You picked D at the convergence of 1.272 XA with 2.00 CD. Did you do that only because it's the only qualifying convergence point for it to be a butterfly?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more