Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

CincinnatiKid_FinalHand

Final hand of The Cincinnati Kid, with Steve McQueen  
 
Customize

More From: Fritzle

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
83 ratings
Sign in to rate
62,901 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (148)   Options

Loading...
sotirisp16 (6 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
so, the odds for a straight flush in classic poker are 1:14000 and for a full house 1:650. Combined are smaller of course, but this doesn't mean that it hasnt happened or will not happen again. look in utube, search for "royal flush vs quad aces" and you'll see a same REAL hand in world poker series 2008!
Paulmancieri67 (6 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@sotirisp16 OK.....so I looked it up. From Anthony Holden's book Big Deal. the odds against any full house losing to any straight flush, in a two-handed game, are 45,102,781 to 1," with Holden continuing that the odds against the particular final hand in the movie are astronomical (as both hands include 10s). Holden states that the chances of both such hands appearing in one deal are "a laughable" 332,220,508,619 to 1 (more than 332 billion to 1 against)
Paulmancieri67 (6 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@sotirisp16 continued: and goes on: "If these two played 50 hands of stud an hour, eight hours a day, five days a week, the situation would arise about once every 443 years." I found it on Wiki....so it may not be correct.....I believe what you are referring to in the WPS 2008 did occur but is Texas Style poker where the players share cards. The five card stud reffered to here in the movie is where the astronomical odds come from...still a great movie though.
sotirisp16 (5 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@Paulmancieri67 I agree the last hand played here seems impossible, but the director wanted to give a vivid picture of the bad beat of the kids great hand! Remember that back in the 60's few people were familiar with poker! As for the hand I was talikng about (in the 2008 WPS), did happen, although the chances were 1 in 2.500.000!! If smthng is improbable, doesnt mean it cant happen. Also the kid's betting in the last hand was suicidal! Reraising after a check/raise-reraise? Never!!
sotirisp16 (5 days ago)
Comment removed by author
Paulmancieri67 (5 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@sotirisp16 I was saying that since the WSOP happened in Texas Style poker then the odds of it happening are(and it did) much more possible. 2.5 mill to 1 in Texas and 332 billion to 1 in stud is a huge difference. I could be wrong because I am only pointing out what Holden said in his book. When I originally saw this I just thought the hand a bit over the top, Jewison had portrayed the game so realistically till then........but good point about the Kid making a bad bet.
ZGMatara (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
can somebody pls tell me the rules of this game....
fileerror404 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@ZGMatara Google 5 Card Stud
mulehead126 (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
And forget the poker rules miscues, etc. What I want to know is how an apparently broke Shooter managed to hold on to such an obvious gold digger/whore like Ann-Margret??? Guess his nose wasn't all that was big...
Corbon440 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
@mulehead126

Look into her stunning eyes at 1:03. Sure she's a bitch but damn, she looks magnificent.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.