Hebrew-Israelite Women * Guarding Your Tongue (1/3)

The purpose of this video is to inform my sisters about their foul language & argumentative nature. This message is out of love & intended for us to ALL grow in Spirit & in Truth.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• quickcapture
• video
• NatanyahTKelly83

[Shehasnomorals]

@garychldress74

Bullshit. Jews never "did away" with feminine principal bullshit. In fact, they are the main ones promoting matriarchy and this can be seen in their "tree of life" bullshit as "Binah" who the matriarchal Jews claim is "supernal mother of the universe."

This can also been seen in today's politics as "Jewish women" are the main ones behind the female supremacy movement known as "feminism." Jews aren't patriarchal they are "matriarchal." Stop lying you greasy motherfucker.

[Shehasnomorals]

*cont*

Kush did not become independent until the New Kingdom disintegrated. Kush was an artificial matriarchy subordinate to Egypt. It was ruled by a viceroy who reported directly to a pharaoh.

I keep telling you Egypto-Babylonian manginas/skanks Egypt (and Kush as well) was not original culture.

The illusion has two sides; women and whites.

[Shehasnomorals]

*cont*

Furthermore, Candace was not an actual person.

References to this warrior queen are among the earliest made to the Nubian Kentakes. The name "Candace" is actually a form of the title "Kentake", and not the actual name of a person.

This is in reference to the inhabitants of Kush. Which was nothing more than an Egyptian province. Thus the people there were underneath the yoke of Egyptian rule. Which, as stated, was not original culture.

[Shehasnomorals]

@garychldress74

Moron that account is "legend" not "fact."

Those accounts, which matriarchists in America believe and propagate, originate from "The Alexander Romance" by an unknown writer called Pseudo-Callisthenes, and the work is largely a fictionalized and grandiose account of Alexander's life. It is commonly quoted, but there seems to be no historical reference to this event from Alexander's time. The whole story of Alexander and Candace's encounter appears to be legendary.

[Shehasnomorals]

*cont*

No real man cares about the "black woman's respect." In fact, she doesn't even respect herself which is why she's running around (with manginas in tow. See weak males) claiming she's "god from Egypt." Men don't have time for that bullshit. Original men aren't putting up with it anymore. Wake up, get a damn clue, and behave like a "woman" which is what you are. You're not "MAAT" or the "Great Mother" or a space alien. None of that bullshit. Wake the fuck up. Period.

[Shehasnomorals]

*cont*

So, I could post more but its quite obvious that the matriarchal bullshit these "black woman is the Great Mother/God/Whatever" motherfuckers believe in was debunked a very long time ago in academic circles.

Since it was already disproven (since the 70s might I add) you can see why these morons have taken to the internet to spread their bullshit. Anyone believing these clowns and thinking they are "black female gods from Egypt" are out of their damn mind.

Men don't want psycho women.

[Shehasnomorals]

*cont*

"This blew to pieces the accepted chain of goddess-related imagery from Anatolia round the coasts to Scandinavia. He was helped by the revolution in the carbon-dating process, which disproved the associated belief that megalithic architecture had traveled from the Levant with the cult of the Great Mother...

"There was no answer possible to Ucko and Fleming, and during the 1970s the scepticism which they embodied proceeded to erode more of the Mother Goddess's reputed range."

[Shehasnomorals]

*cont*

"..absolutely no need to interpret them everywhere as the same female or male deity.

"The second attack was made by Andrew Fleming, in an article in the periodical World Archaeology uncompromis- ingly entitled 'The Myth of the Mother Goddess.' He pointed out the simple fact that there was absolutely no proof that spirals, circles, and dots were symbols for eyes, that eyes, faces, and genderless figures were symbols of a female or that female figures were symbols of a goddess."

[Shehasnomorals]

*cont*

"...early Egyptian figurines of women holding their breasts had been taken as 'obviously' significant of maternity or fertility, but the Pyramid Texts had revealed that in Egypt this was the female sign of grief.... all over the globe clay models very similar to those of the Neolithic are made as children's dolls. Just as in the modern West, most are intended for girls and are themselves female. Another widespread use of such figures is in sympathetic magic ... there was.."

[Shehasnomorals]

*cont*

"One was Peter Ucko, in his monograph Anthropomorphic Figurines of Predynastic Egypt and Neolithic Crete .... Professor Ucko reminded readers that a large minority of Neolithic figurines were male or asexual, that few if any statuettes had signs of majesty or supernatural power, and that few of them had accentuated sexual characteristics (the 'pubic triangles' on many of them could be loincloths). He warned against glib interpretations of the gestures portrayed upon figures; thus.."