Top Comments
All Comments (105)
-
@Ape65 "but even before, taxis were far more expensive"
OK. But I would suspect they weren't allowed to combine fares, which should radically reduce the cost per fare. Plus, they offer fast door-to-door service (something public transit rarely provides, and when it does it's by accident of location, rather than because of any inherent flexibility of the system), and they allow passengers to use productivity- and distraction- devices while being transported -- an advantage over the private car.
-
@Ape65 I forgot streets. Streets -- and bike and walking paths -- complete the neighborhood effect. People wouldn't need to drive around, though. They could just use push-scooters and bicycles. Perhaps golf-carts and NEV's (Neighborhood Electric Vehicles) could be used, but I'm not sure people would see those as necessary for such short distances.
-
@Ape65 A 400x400' building might potentially have a neighborhood on each floor, and the floors might be separable far enough to give a sufficient feeling of "outsideness". So, that's what I meant by private and semi-private spaces. You could have private houses sharing a semi-private neighborhood floor of a high-rise building. Include landscaping and, perhaps, gentle hills. 10 such neighborhoods at 50' height each would stack to 500'.
-
@Ape65 "who want nice quiet green suburban neighbourhoods"
I'm aware of that desire. In my mind, neighborhoods can potentially be stacked -- indoors. It's interesting that the advocates of O'Neill cylinders (huge spinning space habitats holding thousands of people each in spacious California-suburb-style environments), tend not to acknowledge that similar habitats could potentially also be stacked on Earth -- to indefinite heights.
Just add artificial sunlight.
-
@Ape65 On taxis, I forgot to mention that another key efficiency improver is the legalization of shared taxi rides. Public mass transit holds an unfair efficiency advantage over private taxi service when the latter is restricted to unshared rides.
.
"He acknowledges that NYC's system is efficient"
When Teschler referred to "the NYC system", I believe he meant the *entire* system, which would include buses -- especially since he mentioned it with Honolulu's system, which is bus only.
-
@hitssquad Agree, and I wasn't referring to hold-outs, but rather the vast number of middle-aged middle-income people with kids who want nice quiet green suburban neighbourhoods where their kids can play in the street. It's all about street hockey ;-)
-
@hitssquad Thanks for the reference, it may come in handy
-
@hitssquad I couldn't find that reference, but I read the one about the energy efficiency of train-based mass transit. He acknowledges that NYC's system is efficient, and they don't have pushers.
-
@hitssquad I agree on liberalization, but taxis don't reduce road congestion. It doesn't scale up the way commuter trains or subways do. Taxi-buses only make sense on a few limited routes (such as airport to downtown).
-
@hitssquad I'm all for multi-use buildings, and also for liberalizing zoning laws. At it happens, Montreal (and especially Toronto and Vancouver) are in the midst of a condo construction boom, especially downtown. I think the biggest reform to be made is to allow people to have home offices and businesses, but instead of regulating use, cities would have to regulate impacts, which is more complicated.
Lauren the whole see through table idea does not work if you wear trousers
optionsupdate 2 months ago 4
Martenson is wonderful. No ideology, just good formulation of questions and attempts at solutions.
And yes, Roubini is a fraud - and a mean-spirited one at that.
MarcusCMarcellus 2 months ago 3