[Test] SSD vs HDD Real world

Vollständiger Test: http://www.schenx.eu/arti/vertex120.php
Kleine Vergleiche zwischen herkömmlichen Festplatten und einer OCZ Vertex/Mtron Mobi.
Selbst wenn die zeitlichen Gewinne nur kleine sind (vor allem bei älteren kleineren Spielen, so gibt es immernoch den Faktor Lautstärke und Wärme/Energieverbrauch.
Die meisten Vorteile hat man mit einer SSD als Systemlaufwerk (nicht bei billig-ssds mit micron-controller wie Core V2, AData XPG, G.SKill Titan) und bei größeren Spielen mit häufigen Levelwechseln oder größeren Texturen.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Schenx
• SchenxTV
• HD
• SSD
• HDD
• Festplatte
• solid
• state
• drives
• Test
• Review
• Artikel
• OCZ
• Vertex
• Mtron
• Mobi
• Fedora
• Plymouth
• Solar
• Indilinx
• Barefoot

[angleisthebest]

Your hard drive must be cluttered with bloatware, since it is taking so long in your video. An SSD's performance doesn't degrade when using it close to its capacity, but a hard drive's performance will begin to degrade as soon as you go above 50% capacity usage. And sorry to say, but your first test is worthless. Loading different maps renders it so because one can be heavily modded map using higher-res textures while another could be a pre-made one with far less objects to render.

[He4db4nger]

@angleisthebest no bloatware, both are freshly installed. don't know what ya mean. none of the drives was used to its capacity and SSDs (the bad ones) DO degrade (like the "great" intel ones). both maps from hl2 are normal levels from hl2 and episode1.. and both levels did take quite the same time to load from an hdd.

[osht1]

Both are incredibly slow in your test. You must have a bottleneck elsewhere. Most likely motherboard/CPU replated.

While your test does show the difference between the two, I don't think I would find either acceptable and would find the root of your lack of performance problem.

[He4db4nger]

@osht1 i have no idead what you mean. the last tests were done on a notebook, ok it had only sata1 with an intel ich8m, but the great pro for an SSD is the seek time compared to an SSD. it doesn't matter if you have sata3 with 350mb/s ssd or an sata2 ssd on a sata1 interface with 100mb/s like the mtron mobi. i've compared many ssds on many systems and all results are the same: for a operating system it doesn't matter what SSD, mainly you should have an ssd without jmicron controller.

[He4db4nger]

@osht1 and for other examples.. i have bfbc2 on a vertex 120 and every map loads in about 4secs. maybe the examples in the video aren't the best, but the improvement in hl2 can be overtaken to all games with bigger levels than doom2.

[AmH032uTuBe]

@angleisthebest Actually, it's nothing to do with any "50% or more" terms. It's just that the more data stored on an HDD, the more the data goes to the slow disc access areas of the platters stored inside the HDD.

The read-head has to travel back and forth a lot more for the seek time. SSDs don't have any 'seeking' work to do as there are no moving components; although there are slight delays from the hardware signalling.

[CutaoNilaan840]

húhu_passt_híér_ñêt_rëín_âbà_i­ch_bïñ_sö_éìnsåm_wíll_jèmànd_m­ît_míá_schrêîbén

[Exterminator131]

Eclipse boot test was interesting... But I'd happy to see a compilation speed (for Java or C++ - doesn't matter).

[clamo636]

@TheQuillmaster are you keeping your Hdd's cool? need to put a fan right in front of them. hdd'd have moving parts so they get HOTTER! you ever note that your computers ram hardly ever fails....if it does at all? even if it gets a little hot, well ram may got hot but not as hot as hdd's get. hence the reason y ssd's have such a life span. they stay way cooler. ram don't move so it stays alive longer and proformas way faster. air cool an ssd and watch what happens.

[clamo636]

@osht1 that's were the bottle neck is lol that POS phenom and that ATI card. LOL i used to own a 3870 it got replaced with a 9800gt that blew it away and ive replaced all my amd crap with intel. not to mention that motherboard hes got is a bottle neck LOL.

[point6000x]

@TheQuillmaster listen: my 1TB HDD Western Digital had no error for 4 years now. sometimes it runned for more than 3 days. I Run this one in RAID with some other. I had never issues with HDDs?

[TheQuillmaster]

@point6000x SSD is totally worth it. I've had at least 5 or 6 HDD's fail on me. So much that I set up a RAID 1 in mine so I wouldn't lost my data. Speed is a huge difference, yes, but it doesn't fail hardly at all, so it's definitely.

[point6000x]

@TheQuillmaster for what??

[TheQuillmaster]

@point6000x yep

[26psyside]

@ Angelisthebest There is performance drop depends on many things but there is. Even Anadtech reviews show that.