Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Richard Dawkins- EXPOSED!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
5,523
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 11, 2008

I majored in business and education...I have been a teacher in the public school system...and for the federal program Head Start...I was raised with evolution and had to study it in college...unlike most of the people of youtube...me and all my peers...laughed hysterically...and made fun of the Science Professors...but worse than that it is being forced and promoted as a proven law in science and this is a LIE! So all of you who think you are so intelligent...you have been made a fool of by a political atheist movement and Darwinism is at the forefront. If you would study History...you might not be so fooled.

It is time to put Science and Darwinism on trial.

Richard Dawkins is an obvious atheist...but he is a man who has a right to his own beliefs...but a look at how atheists are using science to promote their own agenda. Even though God loves Richard Dawkins too...this is not right.

Below is really how this little beetle came to be....

Can such a mechanism evolve?

The bombardier beetle contains a complex and elaborate system for producing, aiming and firing an explosive mixture of unstable chemicals. The inner compartments containing the two potentially explosive chemicals need to be securely isolated from the outer reaction chamber containing the special enzymes that initiate the explosion.

Countering evolutionary claims, any slow changes in the anatomy of pre-bombardier beetles in preparation for the final configuration of a yet future bombardier would have little or no survival value. It would also be fraught with danger if the various chemicals mixed at the wrong time or in the wrong chamber. Unless everything worked perfectly from the very beginning, the bombardier beetle could literally have blown itself into extinction - or at least boil itself alive.

Imagine this scenario: The first bombardier beetle decides that it needs a protective weapon against predators. So about a million years later, it has somehow evolved all the chemicals, including the inhibitor, and the combustion chamber. The beetle decides to mix the chemicals with the anti inhibitor. But it explodes because it forgot to make the valves so that the chemical mixture could escape. Or perhaps our little friend has everything but the inhibitor and anti-inhibitor. Well, without the inhibitor to stop the chemical reaction, the chemicals also explode. End of beetle and of any future descendants. The possibilities are endless.

Therefore the he beetle could not wait until everything in the system worked, because according to the theory of evolution, creation evolves from genetic mistakes. If the mistakes are good, then natural selection eliminates the previous animal and the current one stays. However, if the mutation is bad, then that beetle dies out, along with all future descendants.

And surely, a proto-bombardier could not have known that various precursor reactants, enzymes, storage compartments, reaction chambers, mixing muscles, and diaphrams would someday be useful if only it could somehow be properly combined as a sophisticated defensive system complete with a swivelling gun barrel and a repeater firing mechanism.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 155 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Wow...somebody who majored in business and education has the expertise to overturn over 150 years of evidence, tests, experiments and successful predictions made by thousands of people who have actually devoted their lives to studying and understanding biology.

    Boy...aren't all of those scientists going to feel ridiculous when the find out that all they needed to do was major in business and education to be able to win the Nobel Prize for falsifying evolution.

    So, when do you get your Nobel?

  • Bible and Fact should not be used as it is an oxymoron.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (623)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Look at him taking advantage of little children. These guys are so evil.

  • Dawkins has many traits of a homosexual. I wonder if this is why he and Lawrence Krauss are such close friends?

  • @FailToTheEpicDegree OK, but what about all the evidence? I'm not jumping to any conclusions. I keep an open mind. There have been experiments done that prove evolution itself is real, but as far as life as we know it coming about by means of evolution is certainly up for debate. No doubt. Believing in intelligent-design seems more based on faith rather than solid evidence. I used to believe in a deity, but I am very skeptical of it now.

  • someone would have to announce to the world that everything concerning evolution anyone was taught in college was wrong. Also it would raise questions concerning the accuracy of carbon dating and other dating methods used in modern science, which would lead to more problems for the leaders and rich men of the world. I used to believe just like many of you in evolution, and I would just as readily defended it. But looking back, I question now if I only defended out of fear of change.

  • in modern science, but the theory of evolution is not one of them, and has probably hindered others from surfacing. I personally know and believe that the men running this world ate atheists. And even if they weren't, the world still revolves around money, if they acknowledged the evidence disproving evolution it would cost the world a fortune! People would lose jobs, the educational programs would have to be changed, and many popular (and rich) scientists would be discredited. Not to mention

  • Wow I know I shouldn't be astonished at how many simple minded people are in this world, but reading through some of these comments I am. Some of you just jump right in to defend evolution, when you yourselves know nothing more then what your taught by others, others who you believe and trust just because they are given special titles for learning the same thing they're teaching you. You shouldn't just trust in a whole of something just because most of it is good. We have made many advancements

  • @MrFungus420 Evolution can easily be proven wrong with strong scientific evidence. Getting a degree in something doesn't make you an expert, in fact it merely makes you a follower of whatever your professor taught you. You should learn to think for yourself instead of believing in whatever your told. If you don't want to think for yourself then by all means, believe what your taught by those who claim to be experts without giving it a second thought.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more