The Cloud Mystery 2/6

Climate change and global warming caused by CO2 - or? Watch these videos and judge for yourself..

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• CO2
• carbon dioxide
• Henrik Svensmark
• Climate change
• Global Warmng
• Clouds

[hamblin31]

I think the main problem could be that "they" can't tax cosmic rays.

[numbskullandy]

The US constitution rightly ASSUMES that Governments cannot be trusted -that's the whole reason for the constitution's existence: to limit the power of Government and to protect the people.

So it should come as no surprise that Government-funded science is designed to allow Governments to assume more power and even to justify it overriding the constitution - which Obama is doing by signing away your liberty to a world government - all in the name of climate change.

Welcome to communism, America.

[chronicrelatavist]

Let me be the first to start the Sun Exchange, I want 3 trillion; or you will all fry horribly, I will be willing trade even Steven to get us out of our national debt to End the Fed and free my children.

[ParapaDrifter]

@Yoetah DoD maybe, elements inside certainly. I've been looking into the royal think tanks like Queen Beatrix's and rockefeller's Club of Rome, bilderberg group, earth summit, maurice strong, they all work together to form our minds a certain way. mainly because they fear overpopulation. and are using the pseudoscience of AGW to shape humanity to murder itself... to save the mothership earth.

Yep the pseudoscience of AGW would "likely fit the bill, The common enemy of humans becomes itself."

[angelpbj]

@ActiveStorage I agree, the rabbit hole goes down and down...

[angelpbj]

@Yoetah they made forecasts based on a limited analysis of solar influence, the last 30 years or so, while the correct analysis of solar activity must necessarily encompass many centuries to be reliable. As you said "questionable correlations". ALL the IPCC analysis that leads to AGW is flawed. They're now starting to say that the next cooling period will be also caused by GW!! How ludicrous.

[angelpbj]

@garith21 that's why the "warming" has stopped in the last 12 years, despite the constant increase in CO2 emissions? OR maybe it's because the solar activity has reduced dramatically in the last years? Even if you compare cycle 23 with the 22 you'll already see an important decrease. If you pay attention, you'll see that glaciers are growing in both poles... since 2007.

[garith21]

@Yoetah

Yet the solar variation doesn't explain the large global changes in temperatures over the last few decades. Which is the whole point of the matter. For example this very video has a chart comparing temps and solar variation during a time period with relatively consistent co2 and other factors so solar events will have a large effect of course. They stop this chart at 1985 because the correlation breaks down very badly as GHG forcing becomes noticeable.

[Yoetah]

The inconvertible fact, here is that even NASA's own study acknowledges that solar variation has caused climate change in the past. And even the study's members, mostly ardent supports of AGW theory, acknowledge that the sun may play a significant role in future climate changes.

(NASA Study Acknowledges Solar Cycle, Not Man, Responsible for Past Warming - Michael Andrews - June 4, 2009)

[Yoetah]

Private think tanks contracted by the DOD to support the CO2 climate change scam

While the NASA study acknowledged the sun's influence on warming and cooling patterns, it then went badly off the tracks. Ignoring its own evidence, it returned to an argument that man had replaced the sun as the cause current warming patterns. Like many studies, this conclusion was based less on hard data and more on questionable correlations and inaccurate modeling techniques.

[ActiveStorage]

u see if they accept it it will be a death blow to thermonuclear fusion model of the sun, and to the big bang theory in general. so it's not just about economy and co2 trade, bussiness and profits.