@broooziy Thanks for that info. As I always say, we can never (as a society) permit direct democracy (e.g. everyone voting on every issue via their computer) because there are just too many loonies around who do not even begin to understand the concept of valid evidence. Imagine true 'majority rule', when the majority is composed of idiots!
@flowerbower as for the former UN diplomat, what is failed to be mentioned is the fact that she was only 8 years old at the time, and obviously very impressionable and hardly a very reliable witness, so slipping in the part about being a a former UN diplomat to try give credibility is just another red herring.
@flowerbower type in mrmorlam1 he has reproduced the laughable "wedding cake spaceship" model, as for the metal samples that the chemist Marcel Vogel tested , well they just happened to vanish straight after he had them and cannot be tested by independent scientists and are proof of nothing
All of that evidence and proof is only the tip of the iceberg. So if you want to back your claims up, go ahead and try to reproduce his evidence. Until then the fact still stands, that the Meier Case is absolutely true and authentic.
Photographs, as he had his money stolen upon arriving in India and also many different people saw the object and the photographs of it. These people include a reporter from the New Delhi Statesman, S. Venkatesh who also produced an article on the subject. This is the foundational evidence to the meier case, which all of the "professional" skeptics (around 20) failed to duplicate in Michael Horns recent challenge. These skeptics include Neil deGrasse Tyson.
at IBM labratories. He concluded that he could not reproduce that metal by any known means on this planet. Or how about the former UN diplomat that met Meier when he was traveling in india in 1964 and took photographs there as well of ufos. She saw these ufos and also went through a PSE test (ya, ya not good enough). But consider that a former UN diplomat is testifying to meiers truthfulness after witnessing the events herself. Also it is impossible that Meier faked the 1964
@flowerbower Please provide proof that they were all fake models. Nobody has been able to duplicate his photos to this day. Also the original investigators had models made in 1978 and tested them against meiers photos. It was found by the photo analysis computer that meiers photos were large objects a distance from the camera, while the models the investigators had made were small objects close to the camera in the photos taken. Also explain the metal that a lead scientist, Marcel Vogel examined
whats the name of this doc ,please+?
BONITOdaHORA 6 months ago
thanks for the upload. any idea what the full documentary is called?
whales 8 months ago
@flowerbower ooops i missed out the letter r in mrmorlam1, yes agree with what you say....Extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence ;))
broooziy 1 year ago
@broooziy Thanks for that info. As I always say, we can never (as a society) permit direct democracy (e.g. everyone voting on every issue via their computer) because there are just too many loonies around who do not even begin to understand the concept of valid evidence. Imagine true 'majority rule', when the majority is composed of idiots!
flowerbower 1 year ago
@flowerbower as for the former UN diplomat, what is failed to be mentioned is the fact that she was only 8 years old at the time, and obviously very impressionable and hardly a very reliable witness, so slipping in the part about being a a former UN diplomat to try give credibility is just another red herring.
broooziy 1 year ago
@flowerbower type in mrmorlam1 he has reproduced the laughable "wedding cake spaceship" model, as for the metal samples that the chemist Marcel Vogel tested , well they just happened to vanish straight after he had them and cannot be tested by independent scientists and are proof of nothing
broooziy 1 year ago
All of that evidence and proof is only the tip of the iceberg. So if you want to back your claims up, go ahead and try to reproduce his evidence. Until then the fact still stands, that the Meier Case is absolutely true and authentic.
2009OLP 1 year ago
Photographs, as he had his money stolen upon arriving in India and also many different people saw the object and the photographs of it. These people include a reporter from the New Delhi Statesman, S. Venkatesh who also produced an article on the subject. This is the foundational evidence to the meier case, which all of the "professional" skeptics (around 20) failed to duplicate in Michael Horns recent challenge. These skeptics include Neil deGrasse Tyson.
2009OLP 1 year ago
at IBM labratories. He concluded that he could not reproduce that metal by any known means on this planet. Or how about the former UN diplomat that met Meier when he was traveling in india in 1964 and took photographs there as well of ufos. She saw these ufos and also went through a PSE test (ya, ya not good enough). But consider that a former UN diplomat is testifying to meiers truthfulness after witnessing the events herself. Also it is impossible that Meier faked the 1964
2009OLP 1 year ago
@flowerbower Please provide proof that they were all fake models. Nobody has been able to duplicate his photos to this day. Also the original investigators had models made in 1978 and tested them against meiers photos. It was found by the photo analysis computer that meiers photos were large objects a distance from the camera, while the models the investigators had made were small objects close to the camera in the photos taken. Also explain the metal that a lead scientist, Marcel Vogel examined
2009OLP 1 year ago