CNN: Ron Paul Got Only 89 SECONDS In Last Night's Debate
Top Comments
All Comments (337)
-
89 sec for Paul wasn't a big deal for these dumbasses. They spent less than 8.9 seconds talkin abt that.
-
Media deliberately want to shape what people think, how they vote , whom to rise and fall in poll. Still who thinks any media is fair is a joke.
-
The guy makes second place and gets less time than the people trailing him in the popular vote? Please explain...
-
Don Lemon sucks zionist cock!
-
Mainstream corporate media blatantly shuns Ron Paul, because he isn't succumb to corporate bribery and he refuses to become a corporate puppet. RON PAUL 2012
-
the debate I watched was the one on Thur/1/19
-
Why is Big Media deciding who to show? Isn't the whole point of these debates to let America see and evaluate ALL candidates? Not for Big Media to decide who they want to promote!
Ron Paul got 89 seconds and still won the debate by at least a brain.
wardydave 3 months ago 64
To be fair, it only takes 89 seconds for RP to win this debate. THEY were arguing about where to send the troops. All RP had to say was "Bring them home". There isn't much else to say about how best to deal with Iran. So since he was able to get the best strategy out in only 89 seconds while the rest spent the majority of time trying to win applause points, I'd say it went down about the way it should have.
nunyabizbitch 3 months ago 14