Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

9/11: The Unofficial Story (2009) :: full length

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,436
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 11, 2011

A look at the Truth Movement and some conspiracy theories. Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth stars. Unfortunately the Pentagon no plane theory was included - as usual.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (CTV911)

  • I wouldn't call it as "well balanced documentary". They presented such very weak theories like no plane hit the Pentagon and crashed in Shanksville, Griffin's and Dewdney's embarassing "fake passenger calls".

  • @TheMKMonarch

    I will change the description there. I'm disappointed about the Pentagon CIT theory for sure. David Ray Griffin makes an interesting case for some of the alleged fake calls in his book Debunking 9/11 Debunking. Funny about Barbara Olson's call being 0 seconds long according to FBI in the Moussaoui trial ... yet the husband said they spoke.

  • Though this video seems to be against the official cartoonish story, they don't talk about things like the wrong audio at 00:12, changed again later at 06:51 on the same video... see September Clues for more info on faked videos and audios.

  • @def4d

    Documentaries often edit footage using different audio. See 911conspiracyDOTtvSLASH2nd_hit­DOThtml -- all airplane videos -- people saw the plane, FYI

see all

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Dewdny gives truthers a bad name with his crackpot theory. How the interviewer kept a straight face i dont know.

  • people are making money from this conspiracy industry.

  • @TheMKMonarch no plane hit the Pentagon

  • Great video. If people finally did enough research it wouldn't be so embarrassing for them. How many years have to pass till you get it?

    If you really were interested, you would've done research. Obviously you didn't. Take your precious time to watch and read facts, opinions and questions from independent experts! The more you know, the more you may judge.

    /watch?v=OQgVCj7q49o Architects & Engineers speak out

    /watch?v=aWl8mUSDIwU Documentary

  • @TheMKMonarch Loose change is pretty well balanced dont you think?

  • 34:17 FULL OF SHIT

  • @klnine Paynes Stuart plane was intercepted in 1 hour and 20 minutes.

  • I am amazed how Richard Gage can make such a fundamental mistake to say that explosives like C4 or RDX would be high energy materials, since he knows that his ae911truth - fellow, chemistry professor Niels Harrit explaines in great detail the difference between high- and low-energy materials, according to which coal or thermite for that matter are high energy materials, but explosives are not.

    Why does Gage fail in such an important and rare mainstream media report.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more