Primetime: Young Women, Porn, and Profits: America's Secret Affair
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (127)
-
@suspiria10, although you make a valid point, the industry is not regulated thus they are not getting health insurance. Also, they can have complications even wearing condoms. They are only 99% effective. Plus, women need to have bi early paps to detect cervical cancer, and we have HPV vaccine now, which health insurances cover. And these are for women not even in the porn the industry that are just sexually active, married or not. So if ordinary people can have these benefits why not the them.
-
why should porn stars receive health benefits when they put their health on the line by not wearing condoms?
-
@fabrikk60 like what movies??? inst it largely the same.
-
On David Icke Lion Sleeps no more 3/4 at 34 mins. He says senior George Bush is child abuser. He also says stuff like they want you to look at dots, and not focus on bigger picture.
-
Gangbangs are popular in the world of porn, but are they popular among all your neighbors, family and relatives too? Probably not! In the real world, probably only 1 woman out of 10 million would ever volunteer to be gangbanged. Maybe not even that many.
-
@13Xanadu Nothing funny in the least. And I was stating a fact related to this vid, which isn't trolling.
-
Re the portrayal of "women always craving sex", that's just a common male fantasy that porn is catering to, and most men realize that in real life such women don't exist. If women were truly that ultra-horny and sexually indiscriminate *all the time*, none of them would ever stay faithful to us would they? It would create social havoc on a massive scale. Sure porn lies about women, about men, and about sex. But the male mind can tune out those lies just long enough to wank is all.
-
I wasn't talking about S&M, I was talking about what has become "mainstream" in porn.
I actually do like porn, as long as it looks friendly and the women aren't portrayed disrespectfully/cruelly. But seeing good porn usually means you have to look at the vintage stuff from the 80s, not this modern ugly garbage.
If you think I "attacked" men, you really have a problem. I said that we men need to look at ourselves and think about what we watch - how is that an attack?
-
@amensupremera I guess they focus on that because it's the most lucrative in the mainstream, and what most people are familiar with. But, you're right, there is all sorts of stuff out there. Terrifying stuff, sometimes... O_O
-
are these men doesn't have children at all? i wonder if they see their young girls (children) or sisters or other even doing it for them! how can this society tolerate these people! and they think this as ENTERTAINMENT! profit!
The porn from 20-30 years ago generally did not emphasize all this extreme abuse of young women, or this ugly/depressing "gonzo" style that looks practically like rape. WTF is wrong with men today that many of us want to see young girls abused like this, and are so callous towards them? C'mon men, we need to look at ourselves - it is our viewing habits that shape what modern porn looks like. Anyone blaming the girls in any way is dead wrong.
fabrikk60 2 years ago 31
Whats really funny is that they portray all porn as dealing with young girls(18-24) What about gay porn, transexual porn, what about female domination porn, Milf porn(older women) fat porn theres all sorts.
amensupremera 2 years ago 13