GOP Strategist Todd Harris Walks into Chris Matthews Buzzsaw on Hardball

more at msnbc.com, January 6, 2010

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• todd
• harris
• todd harris
• chris
• matthews
• chris matthews
• hardball
• gop
• republican
• strategist
• republicans
• party
• accomplishments
• achievements
• 9/11
• september
• eleventh

[BigFlats01]

The only problem you have with him is he asks questions that your guys can't answer..face it..he's smart..and Republicans cant avoid questions when he asks them

[TerroristKiller1]

Bush has kept us safe, hmmm? how can 2000+ victims of 9/11 be so wrong.

[twisted13jesus]

Owned.

[Flyyyy]

Let's be liberal. ......Let's let a few "so called" ....."elite people"... run our lives.....they are smarter than us. They know better than us, they are better than us, We are just fools. Despite our education and degrees from schools "other than Harvard, Yale...."....

Trust them. they have your best interest in mind. They will take care of you.....Who want's to be "taken care of" ?......From they very moment you learned how to walk as an infant.....didn't you away?

Freedom is inborn.

[mr300ism]

@MD40LD50=CHENEY COCKSUCKER

[armonocracy]

@nvieira100 You'll get no argument from me.

:-)

[nvieira100]

@armonocracy And that was my point. The problem with that policy is that you have presidents talking about "policing the world" and being the worlds "arbitrators" when in fact the rest of the world sees america (especially now after Iraq) as nothing more than agressors and empire builders. That's what creates enemies for america and that is dangerous for her citizens. But that being said, it takes people to stand up and protest against these policies.

[armonocracy]

@nvieira100 First of all...hello. And secondly, I wrote on this subject so long ago that I honestly forgot about it. But to be honest with you, I believe I was being more rhetorical than actually standing in defense of GHWB for invading Kuwait. And of course we don't get involved in military conflicts with other sovereign foreign nations unless there's some political or ecomomic benefit to "justify the means". That's why we won't touch the Darfur situation.

[nvieira100]

@donkeysnot Why is that? Is it because he pins fucktard republicans to the wall with their hypocricy?

[nvieira100]

@armonocracy And on Kuwait, the ONLY reason GB got involved in Kuwait, was for oil !! The same reason his retarded son sent Americans to die in Iraq. Ever ask yourself why they didn't get involved in the Bosnia conflict? There was nothing in it for them!

[nvieira100]

@armonocracy Regarding the Korean war, the expectation is that america stay out of it. How would americans have felt if another country, any other country, got involved in the american civil war?! Same applies. America has NO BUSINESS getting involved in other country's civil wars. Just because Russia and China got involved, 2 wrongs don't make a right.

[nvieira100]

@armonocracy If you knew your history, you would know that AMERICANS of Japanese decent fought FOR AMERICA in WWII. If you don't agree with that, then you HAVE TO agree that if america ever went to war against your country of origin, the government would have the right to encarcerate YOU! 'Cuz you do know that the ONLY real americans are the native indians; everybody else are just immigrants, including the founding fathers!