Upload

DON'T WORRY, DRIVE ON: Fossil Fools & Fracking Lies

postcarboninstitute postcarboninstitute·89 videos
3,859
42,358
Like     Dislike 19

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like postcarboninstitute's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike postcarboninstitute's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add postcarboninstitute's video to your playlist.

Published on Aug 28, 2012

125,000 Views (100K on VIMEO)!! Thanks you for SHARING!
(French, Spanish, Slovak & Dutch versions via CC button)

In recent months we've seen a spate of assertions that peak oil is a worry of the past thanks to so-called "new technologies" that can tap massive amounts of previously inaccessible stores of "unconventional" oil. "Don't worry, drive on," we're told.

We can fall for the oil industry hype and keep ourselves chained to a resource that's depleting and comes with ever increasing economic and environmental costs, or we can recognize that the days of cheap and abundant oil (not to mention coal and natural gas) are over.

Unfortunately, the mainstream media and politicians on both sides of the aisle are parroting the hype, claiming — in Obama's case — that unconventional oil can play a key role in an "all of the above" energy strategy and — in Romney's — that increased production of tight oil and tar sands can make North America energy independent by the end of his second term.

WE NEED YOUR HELP.

Please share this video and help bring a dose of reality to the energy conversation:

* Email the video to everyone you think needs to watch it
* Share it through your social networks
* Send it to your elected officials

The video script can be found here: http://www.postcarbon.org/blog-post/1...

THANK YOU.

Animation: MONSTRO DESIGN (http://www.monstrodesign.com)

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/postcarbon
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/postcarbon

SO MUCH MORE at http://www.postcarbon.org


**TRANSLATION SUPERSTARS**

Dutch: Roeland van der Kley!
French: Blaise @ Villeray en transition
Slovak: Jano Kupec
Spanish: Jurgen Obrist

  • Support postcarboninstitute

    Please select a donation value.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Uploader Comments (postcarboninstitute)

  • postcarboninstitute

    We agree with you: fossil fuels have been the "cheapest," most energy rich resource we've ever discovered. But we've picked the low-hanging fruit. Why do you think we're drilling 18,000 feet down in deep water? Or needing to explode rocks below the ground and inject a bunch of waters and chemicals to get at the stuff?

    Yes, technology has made it possible to get at unconventional resources that were previously inaccessible. But it requires higher costs to justify. And they deplete very quickly.

    · 25

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate postcarboninstitute's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate postcarboninstitute's comment.
    in reply to ClarksonsinUSA (Show the comment)
  • Borja Flagg Díaz

    Hydrocracking increases the porosity of rocks allowing natural gas rise to the crust for extraction. By my understanding, it probably would make oil (high quality or low quality) diffuse away from the petroleum reservoirs, hence making it harder to extract; countering the info included in the video. This brings a whole new dimension to the argument, such as nat gas being intended to offset our dependence on foreign oil, but I'd hate to mislead the masses. Other than this... good video.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Borja Flagg Díaz's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Borja Flagg Díaz's comment.
  • postcarboninstitute

    Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing is used for both shale gas and tight oil (shale oil). The technique, in fact, was first developed for oil. It's true that the characteristics of oil and gas are not the same, but both suffer from very high depletion rates. As a result we have to keep drilling more and more in order to maintain production. This becomes increasingly difficult (and comes with rising environmental and energy costs) as the most concentrated resources are drilled first.

    · 2

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate postcarboninstitute's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate postcarboninstitute's comment.
    in reply to Borja Flagg Díaz (Show the comment)

Top Comments

  • SPAnsw

    "We've got to wean ourselves off our high-energy lifestyle. We'd be foolish to wait for events to settle the debate once and for all." (2:14) ...And yet the longer we keep campaigning on this cause to so little effect, the more it looks like civilisation will just wait for events to settle things once and for all... Look forward to hearing Richard Heinberg speak the truth to us here in Australia in 2 weeks!

    · 6

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate SPAnsw's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate SPAnsw's comment.

All Comments (110)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Lucas Fernández

    good video but is soo short

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Lucas Fernández's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Lucas Fernández's comment.
  • Stephen Nielsen

    Oil for products represents a small fraction of the oil that we consume. It is the oil that we BURN that we must get off of. There is nothing nutty in this fundamental truth. BTW, more and more we are able to synthesize petroleum based products using new chemistry techniques.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Stephen Nielsen's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Stephen Nielsen's comment.
  • robert ludlum

    These envirowingnuts forget that oil is more than gasoline. It is your cellphone, new clothes, new flooring carpeting, TV's etc etc. So much is made from oil that until a real replacement is found, we could not live without it.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate robert ludlum's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate robert ludlum's comment.
    in reply to GGWdodge simmon (Show the comment)
  • MegaSavethequeen

    excellent video...thank you

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MegaSavethequeen's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MegaSavethequeen's comment.
  • NoEcologyNoEconomy

    Well, "100 years" seems like an eternity to the average person who only seems capable of projecting their own lifetime.

    The other big downside to gas drilling is how much land it actually impacts, which is also being lied about in investment portfolios.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NoEcologyNoEconomy's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NoEcologyNoEconomy's comment.
    in reply to spud5051 (Show the comment)
  • Hexx Bombastus

    Sunlight is even cheaper, inexhaustible, absolutely clean, and given time to develop the right technology for it, even more efficient than oil could ever dream to be.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Hexx Bombastus's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Hexx Bombastus's comment.
    in reply to ClarksonsinUSA (Show the comment)
  • GGWdodge simmon

    How can you not buy it we need oil like we need food how you expect to get any where without a car?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GGWdodge simmon's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate GGWdodge simmon's comment.
    in reply to Edward m (Show the comment)
  • spud5051

    Besides, after "100 years", then what? That's not exactly an eternity.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate spud5051's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate spud5051's comment.
    in reply to NoEcologyNoEconomy (Show the comment)
  • ClarksonsinUSA

    Believe what ever you want,you should read up and compare many sources of information....I don't care what you believe...Good day...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ClarksonsinUSA's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ClarksonsinUSA's comment.
    in reply to NoEcologyNoEconomy (Show the comment)
  • NoEcologyNoEconomy

    Natural gas has much less energy density than oil. It's not a viable substitute for many applications, and it also peaks, as do all fossil fuels. The talk of "100 years of natural gas in America" doesn't stand up to scrutiny when you study well depletion rates. I think Obama bought into that hype prematurely.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NoEcologyNoEconomy's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NoEcologyNoEconomy's comment.
    in reply to Borja Flagg Díaz (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later