В.Путин.Выступление на Мюнхенской конференции.Part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
20,024
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 27, 2008

Speech and the Following Discussion at the Munich Conference on Security Policy.Part 2
February 10, 2007
Munich


Выступление и дискуссия на Мюнхенской конференции по вопросам политики безопасности.Part 2
10 февраля 2007 года
Мюнхен

Along with this, what is happening in todays world and we just started to discuss this is a tentative to introduce precisely this concept into international affairs, the concept of a unipolar world.

And with which results?

Unilateral and frequently illegitimate actions have not resolved any problems. Moreover, they have caused new human tragedies and created new centres of tension. Judge for yourselves: wars as well as local and regional conflicts have not diminished. Mr Teltschik mentioned this very gently. And no less people perish in these conflicts even more are dying than before. Significantly more, significantly more!

Today we are witnessing an almost uncontained hyper use of force military force in international relations, force that is plunging the world into an abyss of permanent conflicts. As a result we do not have sufficient strength to find a comprehensive solution to any one of these conflicts. Finding a political settlement also becomes impossible.

We are seeing a greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law. And independent legal norms are, as a matter of fact, coming increasingly closer to one states legal system. One state and, of course, first and foremost the United States, has overstepped its national borders in every way. This is visible in the economic, political, cultural and educational policies it imposes on other nations. Well, who likes this? Who is happy about this?

In international relations we increasingly see the desire to resolve a given question according to so-called issues of political expediency, based on the current political climate.

And of course this is extremely dangerous. It results in the fact that no one feels safe. I want to emphasise this no one feels safe! Because no one can feel that international law is like a stone wall that will protect them. Of course such a policy stimulates an arms race.

The forces dominance inevitably encourages a number of countries to acquire weapons of mass destruction. Moreover, significantly new threats though they were also well-known before have appeared, and today threats such as terrorism have taken on a global character.

I am convinced that we have reached that decisive moment when we must seriously think about the architecture of global security.

And we must proceed by searching for a reasonable balance between the interests of all participants in the international dialogue. Especially since the international landscape is so varied and changes so quickly changes in light of the dynamic development in a whole number of countries and regions.

Madam Federal Chancellor already mentioned this. The combined GDP measured in purchasing power parity of countries such as India and China is already greater than that of the United States. And a similar calculation with the GDP of the BRIC countries Brazil, Russia, India and China surpasses the cumulative GDP of the EU. And according to experts this gap will only increase in the future.

There is no reason to doubt that the economic potential of the new centres of global economic growth will inevitably be converted into political influence and will strengthen multipolarity.

In connection with this the role of multilateral diplomacy is significantly increasing. The need for principles such as openness, transparency and predictability in politics is uncontested and the use of force should be a really exceptional measure, comparable to using the death penalty in the judicial systems of certain states.

However, today we are witnessing the opposite tendency, namely a situation in which countries that forbid the death penalty even for murderers and other, dangerous criminals are airily participating in military operations that are difficult to consider legitimate. And as a matter of fact, these conflicts are killing people hundreds and thousands of civilians!

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Не согласен с тобой, Путин очень толковый Президент !!

  • Наш Президент!

    He is our President!

see all

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Посмотрите правду про нефть))))Сколько у нас выливается на землю!!!!

  • ВВП сильный ПРЕЗИДЕНТ!!!!!

  • Путин 2012 по-любому!

  • @papacross2011, приезжайте, покажите, где тут у нас порядок.)

  • Истину глаголит

  • @AHTOIIIKA Что на каком опыте я?Я в своей жизни ничего не воровал, не брал и не давал взятки.Я презираю воровскую,лживую гэбнявую власть.А ты как сщитаешь?

  • @mrkukara4 на своём опыте видать это вы .. 

  • @papacross2011 Боюсь он не захочет,так как нефти в Украине нет.А если нет нефти,то и воровать нечего,а если и есть что,то для путлера и кооператив озеро,это мелочь.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more