Richard Dawkins on Bill Maher 11 April 2008

No, it's their smug, I know everything, you're an idiot persona. Surely you know what I'm talking about, the same snoty superior phony air all atheist pricks have.

Why are they assholes? Because they threaten your own dogmatic beliefs?

He IS an agnostic. And an atheist. They are not mutually exclusive positions.

Everyone is either an atheist (doesn't believe in gods) or a theist (believes).
These two options ARE mutually exclusive and logically exhaustive.

Not believing doesn't mean you claim certainty over something. Hope this helps.

Two atheist assholes.

comon there has to be something we can argue about!

@hellhammerz666 Well its obviously you dont think very deeply, because youd see that obviously the universe is geared towards supporting and producing life, and its not just by accident. You atheists talk about natures "laws" yet you fail to realize, laws dont just form themselves lol By the way you think, you would think that the law of gravity or attraction is just by accident. And obviously life is designed to adapt and evolve, its not just some random nothingness or wtv you atheists believe.

That being said, I wouldn't mate one of my cousins because my family do have hereditary diseases I don't want to risk to see manifest with double intensity in a son.

I would try to avoid mating with someone from a family with a history of diabetes too, because I don't want to introduce that horror in my lineage.

I grew up with a very strong eugenist influence. It is hard to shake that off.

Mating with first degree cousins is actually less dangerous than having kids from age 40 and up.
Mating within your own race also raises the risk of genetic diseases.
Mating outside your race, however, raises the risk of all kinds of problems due to mismatches, from bad dental occlusion to brain arrhythmia.

The paranoia with first degree cousins is pretty much restricted to the United States, due to some very strong eugenist ideas permeating American medicine at the turn of the 20th century.

that 6.9 thing is annoying he sounds like an agnotic.

Just because some recognized person believes in some sort of higher power, it doesnt make it real. I'm still waiting for this irefutable proof of your god, so if you have a link before your next wave of endless spam, go ahead and post it. Even if Dawkins himself came up with some anecdote about god, it would still be irrelevant.

Btw, evolution doesn't happen randomly, it's adaptation to survive. Get your copncepts right before trying to debunk something, please.