Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

A response to David Chandler's nutty claims

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,602
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 24, 2009

Visit the JREF forum for more detailed debunking of anything that comes out of this nutty organisation of liars. This video was submitted to be a video response to David Chandlers original video, but proving that truthers hide from debunkers, he will not allow it.

==============================

If David is talking about the perimeter columns that appear to jump out then straight down, you can see more clearly from this angle as to what exactly is happening:
/watch?v=qhyu-fZ2nRA
5min 30 seconds of this video.

With the upper section lurching forward, and then falling, it "peels" off the perimeter columns directly beneath it which is why they dramatically stick out and then go straight down.

From David's camera angle we can only see the influence this has on the dust and so it's mightily dishonest of him not to show what is really happening.

  • likes, 72 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (264)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WOW.....debunkers have really lost there edge huh..This was pathetic.

  • did you know they never found one toilet, not one. This was NOT a gravity collapse. This was done with very high explosives.

  • Where were the 110 acres of floors and floor trusses then? They were not in the building's footprint. That's because Chandler is correct. The concrete was disintegrated before it ever hit the ground. Only explosives can do this.

  • @fertilizerspike That's what I was going to say. Except the last sentance.

  • KJC, you need some help getting over your denial. I understand your world view would collapse if you accepted the reality of 9/11, but that's the beginning of the healing process.

  • The idiot author of this video apparently fails to realize it isn't just the smoke trailing behind those projectiles that causes Chandler to identify them as "rockets", but their increased acceleration in conjunction with the smoke, exactly what one would expect with late-firing explosives on those building pieces. The author of this video is clearly a fucking imbecile and obviously just another pseudoskeptical JREF clown.

  • This video purports to "explain" the top 10% of the World Trade Center towers demolishing the much stronger bottom 90% by showing a video featuring the top HALF of a building demolishing the bottom HALF. What the video fails to mention, though, is that most of the supporting structures inside that building were pre-demolished, as is a common practice in controlled demolition, and the only way to ensure the building's complete demolition. Fucking morons.

  • Chandler says the top of the building "suddenly disintegrates" because that's exactly what the video shows, despite the shrieking of a JREF clown.

  • The author of this video is clearly ignorant. What starts this "lurch" of the building? Also, since thermite was used, we should not expect only huge explosions (never mind that many videos feature just such explosions), since thermite is very quiet.

  • The 14 floor ABC Cite Balzac demolition was achieved by jacking, not explosives. To suggest it shows the top of a reinforced steel tower demolishing the bottom by gravity alone is misleading (and untrue). Pictures after the dust cleared show much remaining structure, but more to the point, the demolition of the building was started 7 months earlier (by Ferrari Wrecking) in a long process of "selective deconstruction and weakening".

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more