Keith Thompson VS Nadir Ahmed Debate: Is Paul a true apostle? 7/8
Top Comments
All Comments (18)
-
Nadir does not build a historical evidence,, he does not provide evidence to the contrary. He needs to learn how to debate. He is a total embarassment to real muslim apologists like Shabir Ally. Nadir runs in circle. No christian apologists should waste their time debating Nadir because Nadir does not know how to debate.
-
this mahamadan makes me sick.
-
This guy Nadir makes Islam look more like a joke
-
Lol @ shabir: "I don't have to build a case for the Ebionites," despite the fact I spent most of the debate doing that! Fool!
-
Why do you debate losers like Nadir?
-
Seriously is this guy a true Muslim, people blow themselves to bits for complete lies. 72 virgins anybody
-
wow, his truly been pushed into a corn, he actually says in defense, that people die for lies, by bomb, and the hear between the line that he is saying his own religion being false
-
why dies Nadir Ahmed even debate? lol
-
hahahahahaha why does keith not know that the debate is about "Is paul a true prophet" and not "Is paul historically reliable just like he said in 0:45 1 hour into the debate and he does not know what the debate is about?
-
Thank you Nadir for making a fool of yourself, all your answers are "blind faith bla bla bla". Of course there's talking ants and flying carpets of Solomon to show us that you don't have blind faith HA! Nadir said: "I don't have to build a case for ebionites" then why bring them on topic as supposed proof to counter Paul? You can't bring supposed evidence, without being able to confirm the validity of your source you pancake.
HAHAHAH OMGASH DUDE did you just HEAR what nadir said at 4:55 "Yeah people die for lies dude get it through your head people will strap bombs on themselves and die for nothing but lies." hahahah sounds like a religion we are all familiar with.
xchampx 3 years ago 17
Nadir tries to dance around everything keith said......hes a horrible dancer LOL
Button15 3 years ago 6