Voting machine vote-rigging backdoor exposed
Uploader Comments (EmitRelevart)
Top Comments
-
There is currently a lawsuit that has been filed in the DC Federal District Court (by the We the People Foundation) that seeks an injunction to stop the use of ALL e-voting machines, the exclusive use of paper ballots, and hand-counting of ballots in full public view. The lawsuit applies to all States in the Union. Each Governor of each State are being process-served with the lawsuit.
-
Wow, that is amazing!
Video Responses
All Comments (52)
-
That may be so, but by giving everyone the right to a weapon that is designed to kill its victim, killings are far more likely. The increase in knife-related crimes wasn't always here, it was surged recently.
We have had gun bans for god knows how long. You can't attrbute these knife crimes to lack of guns.
Anyway, i'm done on this subject. We can just agree to disagree :)
-
2)
How many criminals do you think obey gun bans?
You can tout these gun bans as something beneficial to society but ultimately, it simply changes the weapon with which you are most likely to be attacked.
So know the UK is suffering from a knife-killing crime-wave. Is this the "good reason" you speak of for the gun ban? In the minds of anti-gun activists, this somehow proves that gun control works because the victim died by a knife instead of a gun.
watch?v=j_YTM_eAWnQ
-
DarkenedVessel
1) Just because some cops in the UK don't carry guns, doesn't mean there is no imbalance between the cops that do, and the people who cannot. Surely the UK military carry guns. You have this delusion that there is some sort of equality in all this.
-
The lack of guns on Police in Britain doesn't create an imbalance at all. Guns are illegal here for a very good reason.
-
PATRIOT ACT we are a police state just with out the cameras and high tech you know we are old school
-
I wasn't insulting you either - just stating a fact. I mean, come on... Sharia Law? Big Brother watching every move? Only law-enforcement/military have guns (yeah, I realize that's the norm there, but it creates an imbalance nonetheless)?
We are trying to prevent the loss of privacy, culture, and freedoms from reaching that level. Otherwise, it would be much more difficult to fight back and restore our freedoms. We have an uphill battle as it is.
-
True. But at least we haven't yet reached the police state status of the UK, with big-brother cameras watching our every move on every street and Sharia Law. I hope we can stop this before we get as screwed as the UK.
I think what is funny is that all these quotes sound "clipped", and that you never see the actual programmer speaking.
Long live youtube.
ObamalsAFailure 1 year ago
@ObamalsAFailure There is no doubt he made these statements. Simply search his name "Clinton Eugene Curtis" and you will find a detailed sworn affidavit, and one of the companies denying it. The company wouldn't deny what this man said if this man had not said it.
EmitRelevart 1 year ago