Molten metal WTC

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,160
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 2, 2006

Molten metal at WTC site.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • It's not a smoking gun. It's Thermite. No plane in the Pentagon or bodies with a hole the size of a chevy. The crater that Flight 93 made in Pennsylvania was visible in 1994.

    And BUILDING 7....You'll like building seven after watching that Bejing Hotel Fire from a couple of months back.

  • I need the continuation of this video!

see all

All Comments (68)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 1500 degree's,and it didn't melt the hose's on the digger?

  • @theBartone9119 I'm undecided on the issue, but I gotta ask you if the Grill on your BBQ melts very often ?

  • @mynameisian91 Sorry not 10 minutes, 4 minutes and 30 seconds was all it took. The video it self was 10 minutes but the fire spread way quicker than that.

  • @mynameisian91 Here is a video showing how fast it takes for fire to spread from the smallest ignition source (lighting the corner of the office with a match).

    watch?v=G6lLbDQcJyA

    10 minutes and that office is engulfed in flames and a raging inferno. What happened on 911 was much worse

  • @mynameisian91 Plus the "small pockets of fire" argument is laughable (I hear it all the time by conspiracy theorists). They were talking about one section of one floor. It's called not taking a quote out of context. The towers were a raging inferno and all you need to do is review a few tapes to confirm that. Anyway, since you care so much about what the fire fighters think, here's a video of a fire fighter standing out front of Building 7 before it collapses:

    watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4

  • @mynameisian91 "Then you have to ask what would create constant temperatures of that degree. All the jet fuel would have burned out in about 10 minutes."

    No. All the jet fuel would not have burned out in 10 minutes, a lot of it would have been used up in the initial explosion, but that's besides the point. Do you know how fires work? All you need is a small ignition source, and fuel (paper, office supplies ect.) and the fire spreads like herpes for a long time.

  • @theBartone9119 Then you have to ask what would create constant temperatures of that degree. All the jet fuel would have burned out in about 10 minutes. Office fires wouldn't be that hot. You can actually listen to the FDNY radio chatter that was released with the firefighters where the fires were expected to be burning, all they saw were occasional small pockets of fires, no infernos.

  • This video is misleading because there is not a single mention of metal, anything could have been burning. The reason why it doesn't matter at all though? Aluminum is the most common metal in the world, plus the airframe of a typical modern commercial aircraft is 80% aluminum. The melting point of Al is 1220 °F, fires in WTC peaked at 1800 °F, do the math....Molten metal being seen would be expected. Conspiracy theorists have no brains.

  • This video is misleading because there is not a single mention of metal, anything could have been burning. The reason why it doesn't matter at all though? Aluminum is the most common metal in the world, plus the airframe of a typical modern commercial aircraft is 80% aluminum. The melting point of Al is 1220 °F, fires in WTC peaked at 1800 °F, do the math....Molten metal being seen would be expected. Conspiracy theorists have no brains

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more