April Gallop's endorsement of The PentaCon

April Gallop tells Citizen Investigation Team that everyone should view the information in "The PentaCon" because it shows fabrication in the official story.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• April
• Gallop
• pentagon
• 9/11
• attack
• conspiracy
• theory
• evidence
• taxicab
• witness
• witnesses
• lightpole
• lightposts
• light
• pole
• cab
• deception
• confession
• lies
• north
• citgo
• flightpath
• flight
• path
• navy
• annex
• gas
• station
• flyover
• fly
• over
• explosion
• explosives
• false
• flag
• wtc
• world
• northside
• 757
• 77
• flight77
• AA77
• AAL77
• american
• airlines
• ntsb
• coverup
• radar
• 84
• rades
• osama
• bin
• laden
• terror
• security
• hijack
• hijackers
• hani
• hanjour
• terrorists
• terrorist
• pilots
• pilot
• potomac
• river

[sr71ablackbird]

@brokencasket 760 mph, anything above that, is constant.

[WearechangeN]

Please tell me more about this. Send me a PM or something :)

[brokencasket]

what is the speed of sound at sea level? I know it's not 700 mph.

[denbenenki]

Good discussion.

Here is an offer: you NAME ONE WITNESS who saw an AA commercial jetliner and I will try to challenge that person.

I have researched so many witnesses that have been reported, I have yet to find ONE credible.

We can have our contest right here on this site. I dare you-- GIVE ME A NAME!

This should be good! the date today is dec. 30th, 2008.

[dollarbear1]

Here is a new clip. NO DEBRIS at the pentagon see for yourself.

watch?v=_0eC3uns3pA

[SSky06]

...What are you talking about? Once again, the magician reference is a strawman, as you are very good at inadequately stating my point and acting like it was some big trick.

The Flight Data Recorder confirms that people saw a low flying, Boeing passenger airliner near the Pentagon, but doesn't show that it crashed there? I'd like to see some sources for that. Also, what are you saying, 136 people saw it there, and then it just disappeared a millisecond before it hit the Pentagon? Where'd it go?

[djjimi]

So, let me ask you a question - when you go see a magic show, do you believe that they really saw the lady in half, or that they can make an elephant or even a jumbo jet appear out of thin air?

Did people see a passenger jet that day? Flight 77's Flight Data Recorder proves that they did - regardless of whether they could ID it or not. Did they see it strike the Pentagon? Again, the FDR proves without question that they most certainly did not.

[SSky06]

(cont)... since the Boeing 757 has a max speed of 568mph and Mach 1 is over 700mph.

Those F/A-18's from the videos go up to 1190mph, and you can be pretty sure that those fighter pilots like to put the pedal to the metal when they do a flyby, especially since most military fighter pilots these days only get about 5 hours of flight time per week.

Your PPS, that actually goes to further my point. Since the Boeing was not supersonic, it would be much easier to identify with the naked eye.

[SSky06]

First of all, reading the tail number is a really bad strawman. No one visually ID'd what flight it was that hit the pentagon, only that it was an commercial jet, and some people said it was AA.

As for your PS, exactly, you could plainly see it was a military jet. You didn't see a missile, you didn't see a Commercial jet. You saw a military jet. 136 people saw a commercial jet at the Pentagon while 0 saw a missile or military jet. You can be sure the Boeing wasn't going any faster...

[djjimi]

Excellent job! I could clearly read the tail number on that one (it was U2HVBNOND)!

PS - we have no clue how fast those guys were moving. Could I tell they were military jets? Sure. Beyond that, nothing.

PSS - You're right, the Angels don't fly at supersonic speeds - which only goes to further prove my point.