US Army shuns system to combat RPGs - NBC News
Top Comments
All Comments (33)
-
Well, here it is, 2011, where are you Ratheon??
-
@vhagler that what I was thinking too also shrapnel is bad but isn't that bad an explosion alone can kill people
-
It must have been between 2000 and 2003, there was a news report on it, like on 20/20, 48 hours, or 60 minutes. An inventor created an airbag which absorbed a very high percentage of a bomb blast. The military was not too interested in it. Sure, it won't work against a whole pile of artillery shells, but would work against alot of smaller explosion. This was before IED became a common term in the news. This guy had invented the airbags for armored limous and other cars.
-
@commnter10 Air bags that would stop IEDS. Haha that is laughable, you must not know what getting hit by an IED is like. If that technology could work the Army would be all over it because it's a lot easier to outfit HMMVVs with airbags than retrofit them to handle the weight of armor.
-
This is a bunch of bullcrap. That trophy system looks like it would work to stop the RPG from hitting the vehicle but the explosion that occurs at a distance outside the vehicle would be more deadly. By exploding the RPG away from the vehicle it enables anyone outside of the hatch to be hit with schrapnel. Troops on the ground would risk being hurt. Troops would either turn the system off or would still be exposed to the blast. Good job army for not wasting money on this system.
-
New RPG like the RPG 30 can defeat trophy according to Russian military.
-
@subjectzer0 dont forget that they also wont replace the M4 over the proven and reliable HK 416. Since contacts with colt is cheaper than HK.
-
Perhaps the Americans have finally realised their pot of Army gold has a bottom?
-
They did the same thing with the airbags. A guy invented airbags to protect against roadside bombs. Extremely effective. Ignored by the Army.
Don't forget it was Army hiearchy b.s. that prevented the use of smoke at Omaha Beach. That was not an operation to be proud of, all the b.s. about our brave troops storming ashore attacking the enemy. They were murdered by the Army brass who wouldn't use such things as smoke and flailing anti-mine equipment on tanks.
just like dragon skin.. the army is on bed with us companies that dont have the best technology. this shit disgusts me... capitalism before the country. money over lives.
subjectzer0 3 years ago 16
the only sensible answer here. The army doesn't care about troop safety so long as it stays within a small percentage. Everything else is bureaucracy and profiteering for control interest groups
saskel2000 2 years ago 12