Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Judge Gray - "Prioritize"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
21,954
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 27, 2010

Retired Superior Court Judge James Gray explains his support for the Tax Cannabis initiative.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • "Kids take many risks when they're on the make, but when you take a risk just know the risk you take."

    ~Judge James Gray

  • @PlayfulRoyal actually... they spend a lot more than they make in fining "drug" offenders. the main reason we want cannabis taxed in california in our current situation is because itll generate about 1 billion annually in taxes. but ur also right, the gov. would spend even less money cuz we wouldnt be wasting all that money catching, prosecuting, and jailing "drug" offenders

see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Yes on PROP 19!!! Click our channel for YES on PROP 19 rap:

    SMOKE SONG by Macarone feat PhishBone (VIDEO) - Yes on Prop 19 Video/Register-A-PotHead

  • @ashash4tube my condolences... i heard weed is like the antichrist over there but meth and coke pretty much grow on trees

  • @MkkDdd I don't agree with that. I personally think I'm a much better driver when I'm not high but that's because when I am and I'm driving, I do actually sometimes find it geniunely difficult to focus on the traffic ahead. Still doesn't mean I can't drive while I'm high, I drove around on shrooms before.

  • this is great i live in Utah and i cant wate till November cali all the way

  • @nelsonbig

    The thing about cannabis, though, is that being 'under the influence' actually makes you a better driver, as most recent studies demonstrate. Yes, it will take some time for a critical mass of people to get their heads around the fact. People, however, may not be as stupid as it might sometimes seem. Sooner or later they'll figure out what's going on and everything will settle down.

  • @lonemilkman

    Well, for a start, cannabis isn't toxic, so any talk of 'intoxication' has to be considered at face value, i.e. worthless. Yes, unfortunately, I would suspect California will have to suffer some assholitis from the police for some time, but they'll work it out in the end. There will be some tragedies and some victims, but however many there may be, there will be less under regulation than there ever have been under prohibition. Prohibition is simply an extension of slavery.

  • This Leg is dangerous...2 new felonies...+ other new laws...This is not re-legalization...it is selling out...After 70 + years of human misery ...We can do this right...We must do this right...

  • What the hell man? Just saw my sample ballot for Sacramento. Why is this initiotive not on the ballot? Everyone said it would be?

  • Tax & Regulate!

    POLITICAL HIP-HOP is on the come back check out:

    The Pledge by Macarone & WOftGOP (VIDEO)

    SEX WIT A DEMOCRAT (Dear Sarah Palin) by Macarone & WOftGOP

  • The problem I see is, how will "being under the influence" be considered? How will blood or blow tests confirm what being under the influence is? Will one joint or one rip from a pipe be considered under? And then if not, what is stopping a cop from pulling someone that looks like a smoker over and giving them a blood test that will show positive?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more