@Ozzrya91 it looks like shit, i dont even know where to begin with that, 15-20 prep sketches? WHO THE FUCK CARES HOW MUCH WORK WENT INTO IT IF THE END RESULT STILL LOOKS BAD.
@Ozzrya91 do you even know what the 4th demension is? and i dont recall saying that didnt factor in, infact i said artists are thinkers, and that you just throw a lot of names around without understanding where they were coming from, id also like to add that artists inspirations go deeper than what some writer puts in a book, and comes from what they themselves say, particularly with dali, assuming you could even understand his autobiography.
@Ozzrya91 i said vision, not visuals, HUGE difference. you shouldnt have to explain yourself, all you can do is make up excuses for why your art falls short, i frankly dont give a fuck. and astrophotography is a fucking joke, if you arent using a purpose built telescope its just some retard in his backyard trying to make up for ambient light from the town you live next to. you are just another in an army of retards which is why art wont get you anywhere, you arent bringing anything to the table
@Ozzrya91 cubism is about modernization not the future, thats futurism, and a different school of thought, as i said last time we had an exchange, you dont understand the art forms you are talking about, you just look at them and copy them, artists spend a lot of time developing theory and writing what they think, not just painting.
@Ozzrya91 dali at your age was in art school studying the trade and getting better, talking with artists, exchanging ideas, not assuming his art was already perfect and simply making up excuses as to how it was better than everyone elses. its about personal vision, having ideas and knowing how to translate them, not about proving yourself, people who are only out to prove themselves, and not express themselves are not artists in any sense of the word, they are egoists.
@Ozzrya91 the primary difference is that in the case of dali it was mere inspiration, he took tools that others had developed and did new things with them, you simply cookie cut different artists into your own stuff and the rest is just garbage, and surrealism isnt supposed to have astronomy because it is contrary to the principles involved, dali was a contemporary of picasso and they learned from each other, but as far as i know dali was not fond of impressionism. a better analog would be grosz
@Ozzrya91 I did like your photograph of the old house and your more original works are good though far to close to whom ever inspired your work for me. As an artist myself i can tell you not many artists want to see sum one redo works or copy patterns or styles of any kind. Especially recognizable ones. Which most of your work in the video i saw seemed to be. if you think im completely wrong about this i would rather have a sensable disccusion then a paragraph of curses.
@Ozzrya91 well sir i vote for fubuxgear.. your art is quite good but not original at all. How many times are you going to resurrect Dali? You must understand anyone with even the slightest art history knows your a simple copy cat. As for all the shit about juggalos hes a hater for sure. This is purely a statement about your art sir.
@Ozzrya91 im older than you, im an artist, i hang with artists, and present myself as an artist, so the swoosh does ok for me, i dont have a scanner or a decent digital camera, nor do i feel i have to prove myself to some moron on youtube. you already "lost" because art isnt a pissing match. you are just an ego driven nerd.
@Ozzrya91 it looks like shit, i dont even know where to begin with that, 15-20 prep sketches? WHO THE FUCK CARES HOW MUCH WORK WENT INTO IT IF THE END RESULT STILL LOOKS BAD.
FUBUXGEAR 1 year ago
@Ozzrya91 do you even know what the 4th demension is? and i dont recall saying that didnt factor in, infact i said artists are thinkers, and that you just throw a lot of names around without understanding where they were coming from, id also like to add that artists inspirations go deeper than what some writer puts in a book, and comes from what they themselves say, particularly with dali, assuming you could even understand his autobiography.
FUBUXGEAR 1 year ago
@Ozzrya91 i said vision, not visuals, HUGE difference. you shouldnt have to explain yourself, all you can do is make up excuses for why your art falls short, i frankly dont give a fuck. and astrophotography is a fucking joke, if you arent using a purpose built telescope its just some retard in his backyard trying to make up for ambient light from the town you live next to. you are just another in an army of retards which is why art wont get you anywhere, you arent bringing anything to the table
FUBUXGEAR 1 year ago
@Ozzrya91 cubism is about modernization not the future, thats futurism, and a different school of thought, as i said last time we had an exchange, you dont understand the art forms you are talking about, you just look at them and copy them, artists spend a lot of time developing theory and writing what they think, not just painting.
FUBUXGEAR 1 year ago
@Ozzrya91 dali at your age was in art school studying the trade and getting better, talking with artists, exchanging ideas, not assuming his art was already perfect and simply making up excuses as to how it was better than everyone elses. its about personal vision, having ideas and knowing how to translate them, not about proving yourself, people who are only out to prove themselves, and not express themselves are not artists in any sense of the word, they are egoists.
FUBUXGEAR 1 year ago
@Ozzrya91 the primary difference is that in the case of dali it was mere inspiration, he took tools that others had developed and did new things with them, you simply cookie cut different artists into your own stuff and the rest is just garbage, and surrealism isnt supposed to have astronomy because it is contrary to the principles involved, dali was a contemporary of picasso and they learned from each other, but as far as i know dali was not fond of impressionism. a better analog would be grosz
FUBUXGEAR 1 year ago
@Ozzrya91 I did like your photograph of the old house and your more original works are good though far to close to whom ever inspired your work for me. As an artist myself i can tell you not many artists want to see sum one redo works or copy patterns or styles of any kind. Especially recognizable ones. Which most of your work in the video i saw seemed to be. if you think im completely wrong about this i would rather have a sensable disccusion then a paragraph of curses.
lookout4kneegrows 1 year ago
@Ozzrya91 well sir i vote for fubuxgear.. your art is quite good but not original at all. How many times are you going to resurrect Dali? You must understand anyone with even the slightest art history knows your a simple copy cat. As for all the shit about juggalos hes a hater for sure. This is purely a statement about your art sir.
lookout4kneegrows 1 year ago
@28Turts denton is lame and full of hipsters
FUBUXGEAR 1 year ago
@Ozzrya91 im older than you, im an artist, i hang with artists, and present myself as an artist, so the swoosh does ok for me, i dont have a scanner or a decent digital camera, nor do i feel i have to prove myself to some moron on youtube. you already "lost" because art isnt a pissing match. you are just an ego driven nerd.
FUBUXGEAR 1 year ago