Britney Spears (Rare Footage!)

Rare video of Britney singing at a beauty pagent in 1996. This was right before she left for New York to record "...Baby One More Time."

Category:

Music

Tags:

• britney
• spears
• rare
• footage
• 1996
• wedding

[TragicFantasy]

Her natural voice sounds nice and is so much better than that nasally, annoying voice they make her sing in. You know, if she had sang with her natural voice she may have not gained as much attention and money, but at least people would respect her.

[TyWalkerMusic]

I'm so mad at her label or whoever made her "change her voice" from this, to the "commercial style" she uses now...

[noemistephanie93]

she sounds amazing and i never knew she was in a beauty paegant! but then again im not suprised, she's sooo damn gorgeous!

[kalElx]

@TyWalkerMusic i'm so glad she canhanged it, she's voice is cool, sexy and sweet now =)

[ladysasha90]

@MsTreysongz1 She lipsyncs because the songs she song are not suited for her voice...she's a contralto being told to sing soprano, that's why she doesn't sing live her confidence level in her vocals has deminished...but what is Christina's excuse for having shitty vocals becuz she is most definitely not the voice of any generation let alone this one that belongs to the real vocalist: Beyonce. Christina is just a white girl with a loud voice that's why shes famous so get over it

[MsTreysongz1]

@ladysasha90 3.5 octaves ? ROFL?? i am done talking to you are delusional ,i rather have christina with her bad technique that lip sing ,brit gets by on catchy songs and auto tune if Britney is a such a great singer that why does she lip sing and even when lipsinging she sounds horrifying, she caNOT sing , christina is the voice of her generation not Britney , on every list of greatest singers of all time xtina is on it build a bridge and get over it ,christina is better

[ladysasha90]

@MsTreysongz1 EVERYTHING U JUST SAID WAS A LIE..BRITNEY HAS A 3.5 OCTAVE VOCAL RANGEI AND IF CHRISTINA COULD IMPROVE ON HER TECHINIQUE WHY HASN'T SHE DONE IT.WHY HAS SHE FORCED US ALL TO LISTEN TO HER STRAINED SHOUTED NOTES FOR THE PAST 12 YEARS? YOUR LACK OF MUSICAL KNOWLEDGE IS AMAZING.YES BRITNEY MAY NOT BE THE BEST SINGER BUT THE PURPOSE OF THIS VIDEO IS TO SHOWCASE THE FACT THAT BRITNEY WAS BORN WITH NATURAL TALENT..BUT UR SO DELUSIONAL TO REALIZE THAT AND GIVE ANYONE WHO ISN'T XTINA PROPS

[MsTreysongz1]

@ladysasha90 a technique is something that can be improved and she choose to make her voice raw over the years but sometimes too much raw isn't always good but you cannot denied that her voice is amazing if brit voice is so great that why does she lipsing she cannot sing she was named the worst singer of all time,she is barely 2 octaves , even Rhianna is a better singer , i rather pay to see gaymen lipsing christina one of the greatest vocalist of all time just ask Whitney&celine

[ladysasha90]

@MsTreysongz1 Oh yea so is that why she has one of the worst techinques known in music history, or that fact that everytime she belts she often shouts and strains on notes as simple as D5, or is it the fact that every other aspect of her voice is even whispered or used the wrong way. Please tell me what's so great about her voice? O and by the way it doesn't change the fact that Britney's range was bigger then Christina's when they were kids and that she could belt an F#5 and Christina couldnt

[MsTreysongz1]

@ladysasha90 christina is better and it doesn't really matter cause now Britney can't sing to save her life and all these notes are wrong ... seriously F#5 in your dreams .it doesn't really make any sense to argue who was better cause i know christina is . always have and always will be

[ladysasha90]

@MsTreysongz1 Are you for real with me? Christina's voice has never been deeper then Britney's EVER. Britney at 13 was singing D3's and E3's, while Christina could barely sing a A3, and that's a fact. Bigger range? Wrong once again. When they were kids Britney showed off C#3-F#5 and probably more while Christina's range was A3-G#5. Now you tell me which one is the bigger range. Britney could belt to a F#5 while Christina an E5. We could go on and on but FACT Britney was a better singer

[MsTreysongz1]

@ladysasha90 christina was better and still is i have seen the clip and and her voice was not the strong at the age of 12 and even 7 christina was singing better , her voice was deeper and she had wider range it is obvious that u deaf and why i am arguing with you because i know christina is better it is not assumption but fact there is a clip of christina singing vision of love at the age of 7 look it up she was better an still is , then go look up i have nothing singing at age 12