Transient vs Persistent Contrails (a.k.a. Chemtrails) [1080p]

Full HD contrail comparisons. These videos were taken at my current residence in Cheshire.

Freedom of Information petitions can be found at:
http://www.number10.gov.uk/

Please take the time to sign them, as every signature counts.

Thanks, Jim.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• transient
• persistent
• contrails
• chemtrails
• chemical
• biological
• warfare
• sky
• cover
• eugenics
• new
• world
• order
• nwo
• establishment
• bilderberg
• population
• reduction
• agenda
• infowars
• prisonplanet
• sex
• drugs
• rock
• and
• roll
• tag
• tags

[jimbobg65]

@DumpYourTelevision Yeah, I will dig deeper. I think the main questions on YouTube videos are"is what I'm seeing a chemical containing contrail? and if so, are those chemicals the component that's making it longer than it would normally be?" I really have no idea if these ones are or not, but what I do know is that there are organisations out there specifically talking about adding chemicals to jet fuel. There's no doubt in my mind they've already been doing it since it is now in the mainstream.

[DumpYourTelevision]

@jimbobg65

Great observation, what a coincidence its with the sun spot minimum (thermosphere shrinks) If the new sun spot cycle 24 get really going again, expect that in about 4 or 5 years the chem trails will diminish due to the expansion of the thermosphere, if am wrong it will be obvious, and if your wrong, likewise.

Thank you for your interaction, and not blocking me because I don't "believe" in chemtrails :o) he he he -

I used too!

[DumpYourTelevision]

@jimbobg65

Dig deeper, but look at what layers make up the atmosphere, it gets kinda hot up there, with other layers that quite cold, as they fly through these layers (like a rough sea) they sometimes go in and out of the "hot & cold" and produce "morse code" type of trails - just to get you thinking a bit more, Though I highly recommend anyone checking out the different layers of the sky! its a fundamental part of the equation.

I used to be a believer, until I did my own research.

Cheers!

[jimbobg65]

@DumpYourTelevision I know that atmospheric conditions allow for formation of persistent trails, but I have also noticed in the past 5 years I have been observing the sky that there is an increased frequency of aircraft that are outputting these persistent trails. To be honest, I now wish I'd documented my observations from a scientific perspective with full controls and been able to put that up on YouTube.

[jimbobg65]

@DumpYourTelevision My opinions is formed from observations of the formation of clouds from water vapour (due to atmospheric conditions), research into non-governmental organisations conducting experiments in weather modification, the modus operandi of these organisations aswell the psychology of the Human species. It probably looks like I have only pointed a camera to the sky, but I assure you I have looked fairly deep (probably not as deep as I should, but enough to know I want to know more.)

[DumpYourTelevision]

@jimbobg65

Oh, have you formed an opinion upon ignoring the medium that aircraft fly through? the same ignored medium that actually produces the "effects" (shall we say) of aircraft that many are "debating".

Obviously the air is a very important factor, a kin too a car without wheels due to "rubber" being ignored?

The atmostshere has many levels which change with the sun spot cycle the "biggie" being the thermosphere.. I highly recomend ANYone checking that out, and forming a second opinion

[jimbobg65]

@DumpYourTelevision I have no idea what height the trails are formed at. That's something I have looked into, but have forgotten the figures. To be honest, we don't even need to know that. It's almost like saying "at what concentrations is hexafluorosilicic acid toxic waste good for us?" I think all we need to know is what is currently happening and how to stop it. Until they release documents, most people will still buy the mainstream version or not look into it deeper. It's ashame really.

[DumpYourTelevision]

@jimbobg65

You forgot to answer my first question :O)

[jimbobg65]

@DumpYourTelevision For instance: they claim water fluoridation is good for our teeth, then they simply use it as an excuse to dump toxic waste into the water supply. They are claiming we need to add nucleation media to jet fuel (and have been doing for a long time) in order to create clouds to combat the fake dangers of "climate change", yet it is another excuse to dump toxic waste on the Human species. It's happening all over society in many different forms and I'm sick of seeing it happen.

[jimbobg65]

@DumpYourTelevision I'd like a debate in a proper forum. People sitting in a room together, discussing it over a large table full of food. Too many YouTube debates go off tangents due to limited amount of characters to type into one comment. The way I see the whole chemtrail thing is that it's so incremental, that people don't notice it. It's one of those things you can't comprehend until you see the documents about what they are actually doing, and then it makes perfect sense.