Headzup: McCain Compares Ron Paul To Hitler Appeaser

At the CNN/YouTube Debate, John McCain compares Ron Paul to a Hitler appeaser.

See the actual clip here--
http://youtube.com/watch?v=vFFD3vTiVKA

Download daily Catch and Release Comedy™ political cartoons to your mobile phone or iPod at http://www.headzup.tv

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• john
• mccain
• ron
• paul
• hitler
• appeaser
• isolationist
• debate
• cnn
• headzup
• heads
• up
• mobile
• cell
• phone
• mms
• messaging
• parody
• mobisode

[xordan2]

Ron Paul needs to be Penciled in!

[Catalysis24]

@mucura1 Fascism isn't imperialistic, AT ALL. Its nationalistic.

[MrGreenPoop1000]

@nafaidni And here's another reason: although he did not express this view to the public, it is “a matter of fact, that Hitler had more of an appreciation of Communists and even of certain Socialists than of capitalists,” (Lukacs 86).

I have to sleep now, but I can bring you more later or simply send you my entire thesis w/o having to dumb it down by limiting it to 400 characters for each post...

[MrGreenPoop1000]

@nafaidni On FDR, a liberal messiah, Adolf Hitler told a New York Times correspondent that he has “sympathy for Mr. [Franklin] Roosevelt because he marches straight forward his objectives over Congress, lobbies, and beauracracy.” He later described himself as the only European leader who expressed “understanding of the methods and motives of President Roosevelt,” (Woods 244).

Germany went to war against the US for global domination, but Hitler personally admired FDR.

[MrGreenPoop1000]

@nafaidni On Eugenics (a template for the Final Solution), it was a LIBERAL progressive who was one of its greatest supporters: Planned Parenthood's Margaret Sanger. And regardless of Sanger's defenders claiming she was not associated to scientific bigotry, it becomes increasingly difficult to hold such an opinion when it has been documented of said association, such as her contributing article to the March 1929 edition of the EUGENICS scientific journal.

[MrGreenPoop1000]

@nafaidni Those who demand drastic and immediate change with the exclusion of rigorous discussion are separate from conservative ideals, whether they acknowledge it or not (in other words, they're LIBERAL). Not only did National Socialism force monumental change with a complete lack of discretion, but they did so through the government to suppress freedom and blind the masses into following their Führer towards utopia, just as Russia had done under Stalin and the ideals of Marxism.

[MrGreenPoop1000]

@nafaidni A major reason why Hitler was left is that his ultimate goal was for a utopian society. Conservatives as a whole don't believe a utopia will ever exist (on this earth). When the conservatives of the American Founding placed safeguards to subdue the worst of human nature, they acknowledged that the conflicts would always remain. Far-right anarchists demand the suspension of safeguards, they do so w/ the intent to eliminate government in its entirety, something the left would never do.

[MrGreenPoop1000]

@nafaidni The myth of Hitler being Christian has been said by many in the past decades. But is founded upon political expediency more than his actual beliefs. Hitler was not an atheist, but he did have a religion that was forced upon the rest of Germany: the worship of himself. In the public's eyes, he loved an “Aryan” Jesus who fought the Jewish “brood of vipers,” an obvious distortion of biblical teachings. But In private, he considered himself greater than religion, and above Christ.

[MrGreenPoop1000]

@nafaidni "Hitler was big-business." FALSE: On January 19, 1933, the German social democratic magazine known as Vorwarts published a cartoon that reflected “the wide-spread misapprehension that Hitler was financed by German big business… The statement below the title, ‘Hitler dined with heavy industrialist Fritz Thyssen on Wednesday,’ was erroneous,” (Turner Jr. 66-67).

[MrGreenPoop1000]

@nafaidni “Stalin and Hitler were both anti-capitalists. Neither dictator accepted unrestricted economic individualism, the free market and the profit motive that defined capitalist systems. Both superseded the age of liberal or bourgeois economics with a new economic order.” (Overy 398-399). And, “while Hitler denounced Marxism, he also denounced capitalism… He was opposed to free markets. Nazis had embraced such anti-capitalist slogans as “break the bond of interest slavery,” (Powell 249).

[MrGreenPoop1000]

@nafaidni Hitler’s opposition to the Bolshevism of Russia wasn't b/c of a disagreement w/ ends. In terms of collectivism, Hitler and the Stalin were the same. they shared the same goal of creating a utopia for their nations.

In Germany and the Soviet Union, citizens were controlled by a singular party that successfully aimed to quelch dissent. Both desired to have their regime as the king. Because of this, it was inevitable for them to wage war; supreme power is reserved for one leader, not two.

[MrGreenPoop1000]

@nafaidni Hitler was also in accordance with Rousseau b/c he disdained the bourgeoisie society of Europe (“bourgeoisie” refers to a class that was said to be overly focused on private property and self-interest while neglecting others).

And with regards to other “inferiors” and dissenters, the main difference between Hitler and Roebspierre was that Hitler did not use a guillotine against his enemies; he used gas chambers.