Solve for X: Anthony Sutera on low power wireless everywhere
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Uploaded on Feb 7, 2012
Solve for X is a forum to encourage and amplify technology-based moonshot thinking and teamwork. http://www.wesolveforx.com G+: http://goo.gl/T3qQo
We like to imagine the creators of the future as geniuses who build their world changing products out of first principles. They know what it is and why it works before they begin building. But sometimes it doesn't happen that way. Sometimes great ideas are the product of discovery and tinkering. Anthony tells us about an accidental discovery that may change the world of wireless communications.
Anthony Sutera is an entrepreneur in communications, specializing in radio, satellite and wireless communications systems. He is currently the CEO of Chamtech Enterprises, a company holding several patents on its nano, spray-on antenna technology.
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
-
10:28
Power in the airby EconomistMagazineFeatured
54,417
-
18:33
Solve for X: Neal Stephenson on getting big stuff doneby Solve for X
61,867 views
-
14:25
Solve for X: Mike Cheiky on negative carbon liquid fuelsby Solve for X
25,878 views
-
16:40
Solve for X: Rob McGinnis on global water scarcityby Solve for X
20,683 views
-
11:37
Solve for X: Mary Lou Jepsen on imaging the mind's eyeby Solve for X
22,228 views
-
15:09
Solve for X: Kevin Dowling on stretchable electronicsby Solve for X
9,917 views
-
11:30
Solve for X: Danielle Fong on economical energy storageby Solve for X
5,451 views
-
12:39
Solve for X: Andreas Raptopoulos on physical transportby Solve for X
23,888 views
-
11:05
Solve for X 2012: Eric Schmidt and Sergey Brin open the eventby Solve for X
24,147 views
-
10:18
Solve for X: Daphne Preuss on agricultural productivityby Solve for X
5,126 views
-
9:57
Solve for X: Adrien Treuille on collaborative scienceby Solve for X
18,128 views
-
12:27
Solve for X: Privahini Bradoo on resource reclamationby Solve for X
10,591 views
-
15:14
Solve for X: Juan Enriquez on harnessing synthetic geneticsby Solve for X
10,501 views
-
12:22
Solve for X: Omri Amirav-Drory on synthetic life toolkitsby Solve for X
20,984 views
-
13:32
Solve for X: Mir Imran on drug deliveryby Solve for X
6,911 views
-
12:43
Solve for X: David Berry on efficient nutrition productionby Solve for X
8,364 views
-
37:40
About Wireless Power Transferby vk2zay
149,853 views
-
14:07
Solve for X: Charles Chase on energy for everyoneby Solve for X
83,892 views
-
14:04
Solve for X: Andras Forgacs on sustainable, scalable meatby Solve for X
23,205 views
-
5:40
Sea Water Antennaby SPAWARPacificT2
151,232 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
Superfungus0 1 year ago
#5 even if they had special access all they could realistically do is measure the BER. There is no accurate way to translate that directly into an antenna performance metric.
Also notice they abbreviate milli-watts as Mw.
These guys are just belligerent idiots trying to weasel their way to some of Uncle Sam's sugar.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
spoogegoat 1 year ago
So much hand-waving is used and so much is unnecessarily obscured in the manner of “ignore the man behind the curtain” instead of conveying any salient principle. Most of all, the product to be sold is in a spray can from which any product can be magically made better. Everything points to a fraud much like those involving magic fuel efficiency pills.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (201)
Delle Emme 2 months ago
Considering the health effects associated with current aerosol sprays on the market how safe is this stuff meant to be? Electromagnetic waves? Lungs? Skin absorption? Privacy, safety, security? Ecological repercussions?? Think, people. This is ridiculous, and IMO sounds a tad dangerous.Sure we have wifi but we dont kno long term effects from that yet, why go suffocating the environment & ourselves just for 10% better phone reception?! Stupid...
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sandor Daroci 2 months ago
cool, give that BS to govt to use it control you even more... and spy on your a** more.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
utoober33 2 months ago
This is complete bunk. I don't want to even get into explaining why. You should listen to their CTO's presentation (at ARRL I believe) which is comical.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
WAPTek2 2 months ago
allow your self to be empowered
look up diy wifi biquad antenna
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
WAPTek2 2 months ago
this was a confidence scam, it failed, & they took down these claims
& WHEN someone trys the same scam
they get sued into the ground some other
conspiracy theorists will say suppressed technology
& the cycle repeats
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Josh Goller 3 months ago
3:13 They "computated" the results? dafuq.jpg
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Lexdude0 3 months ago
Unless you're talking about the "Rebecca Black"s of pop songs, I don't get you.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
OnTheLambda 3 months ago
Certain frequencies are disruptive .
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Lexdude0 3 months ago
You do realise light is electromagnetic, right? If you're not bothered by staring at the LCD screen you're typing from, you can live with a few antennas here and there.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
John Rutherford 3 months ago
I'd like to know A) the environmental effects, B) if this will be available to the public and C) what does the paint do to humans? I think it could do a bit of good especially where low-income schools/areas are concerned. There are miles of copper wire where my mother works, just so they can have internet in every classroom. Imagine if all they did was paint a strip on the wall? It could also be done in areas where there is no internet access like out in the country. Think of the possibilities!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube