@carcabe Yes! But there has to be a process that forms the moment of now a continuous process of creation or change that we see and feel as the flow of time. We should be able to understand this scientifically!
@nickharvey7 There are only two ties: now and not now. Not now is the nonexistence of now and as nonexistence does not exist, the nonexistence of now does not exist. There is only now. Man perceives nonexistence but it does not and can not exist. Nonexistence is an illusion. Not having, not being, not doing are only perceived nonexistence. There is only being, doing, having. There is only now.
Thanks for posting Diana! It is deeper than my theory on the dynamics of light and time, but the two ideas could become one. I feel it is best to start by explaining time as a physical process then there is more chance of the idea being seen as scientific.
@carcabe Yes! But there has to be a process that forms the moment of now a continuous process of creation or change that we see and feel as the flow of time. We should be able to understand this scientifically!
nickharvey7 7 months ago
@nickharvey7 There are only two ties: now and not now. Not now is the nonexistence of now and as nonexistence does not exist, the nonexistence of now does not exist. There is only now. Man perceives nonexistence but it does not and can not exist. Nonexistence is an illusion. Not having, not being, not doing are only perceived nonexistence. There is only being, doing, having. There is only now.
carcabe 7 months ago
Thanks for posting Diana! It is deeper than my theory on the dynamics of light and time, but the two ideas could become one. I feel it is best to start by explaining time as a physical process then there is more chance of the idea being seen as scientific.
nickharvey7 7 months ago
hgfd
parosg44 2 years ago