Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Airbus A380 Air Force One - L@@K AT THIS!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
42,673
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 3, 2008

http://www.dynamicartsgallery.com/ Airliner Profile Art... Are you a Crew Member, Aviation enthusiast, work within the airline industry, maybe work for an Aviation Publication or a collector? Please view a range of prints at my online gallery. Each Aircraft drawing is digitally created and painted allowing accuracy and detail. All of my artwork is printed on high grade photographic paper. I can produce commissions for customized airline livery prints, so if you would like an artist's impression of your favourite aircraft in in any proposed colour or livery design you will be offered a first class service.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 7 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • hehe, boeing is, shit, but the most american idiots forgot that boeing was founded by an german, the original name was Böing, but americans are so stupid that they wrote his name like this: Boeing

  • No, Air Force One must stay american. But the A380 should be for the future president of the European Union.

see all

All Comments (130)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @wahaya2 I can see the 747-8 Intercontinental as being a better replacement. The engines are newer, the plane is bigger and more efficient, the crew would already be well equipped to use it since its just an elongation and update to the 747-4. And it makes more economical sense for the Government, Boeing and even EADS (as you already stated). Honestly though, the current Air force Ones are doing just fine and they can probably skip the current gen and wait for another gen of aricraft.

  • Put the US President in a Cessna. Or fly him scheduled. Times are tough. Why does he need a flying palace? If the security on a standard airliner is good enough for the rest of us then why is it not good enough for the President? Unless the airlines are being cavalier with our safety?

  • @MasterLouisSG the prime minister of the UK should fly a Concorde imo.

  • I like the concept, excellent work

  • @AMITZpaintball I get that, but from a purely practical point of view and putting aside all patriotic considerations, you'd have to say the A380 is the best plane currently flying for the job of replacing the current Air Force One... It's much quieter, can land pretty much anywhere a 747 can, has huge amounts of space for electronics and the like.... in short they really have built one hell of a plane in the A380.

  • @bvestationfan A four-engine mod for a 787 would be CATASTROPHICALLY expensive, you'd basically need a whole new wing, plus enlarging it, you're basically just building a whole new aircraft there.

  • @nickelfilling1 Incorrect - they did invite Airbus to tender, or to bid for the contract. EADS, the parent company, declined on the basis that, for all the modifications needed to the aircraft to change it from your regular A380 into an Air Force One replacement, they'd have to basically assemble it in the US, where they don't have any pre-existing plants, and for only three planes it just wasn't economical.

  • lol thats funny

  • @Ravenwing3000 You dumbfuck, the double-dots above vowels don't exist in the English language. So EVERY English speaking country writes an "e" after. Same in England and Australia. Dumbshit, that's not an American thing. Besides, that German guy came to AMERICA, so he's AMERICAN. Everyone in the US came from somewhere else. Go back to school and get an education you worthless close minded piece of shit.

  • @jeremyv11000

    Boeing was never, ever more reliable than Airbus. I think you just wrote that from the top of your head. Look at the safety records. Example: a320 family came out in 1987, while the 737 NG game out it 1997. The a320's still have a better safety record.

    Yes, it is USA's pride as Boeing is manufactured in the USA but Airbus, like it or not, is much more reliable because it is more computer based, while Boeing planes are more prone to human error which is the primary cause of crashes

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more