SEPTEMBER CLUES H

The SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://www.septemberclues.info

The SEPTEMBER CLUES forum: http://www.cluesforum.info

On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple techniques of image manipulation were employed to simulate "airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks were proactively complicit in staging this false-flag operation needed to gather public consensus to wage immensely profitable, illegal wars.

The forensic analysis of the live images leave no room for doubt : they do not depict authentic imagery nor real airplane crashes but turn out to be entirely doctored video sequences which effectively fooled the worldwide TV audience. Thus, the live broadcasts now stored in the major TV networks' archives, constitute the most solid, verifiable and repeatable proof to expose the falseness of the official version of the 9/11 tragedy.

The subsequently released, so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites yet all have now been exposed for what they are : total forgeries. Most likely, electromagnetic technology (commonly used in war zones (to jam electronic circuitries) prevented any private footage being recorded at the time of the tower strikes. Scores of testimonies confirm that cellphones or firefighters' walkie-talkies did not function properly in NYC that day.

Most on-the-scene witnesses reported a SMALL aircraft of some sort : Arguably, what they saw was a winged missile. The 4 purported hijacked flights, as well as the related passenger lists, turn out to have several problems as far as their authenticity is concerned : a long list of documentation (or lack of it) reveal serious discrepancies regarding NTSB, BTS and FAA data. All of the above facts, taken together, suggest that none of the official descriptions of the events are credible.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• 9/11
• 911
• television
• news
• september
• clues
• 11
• tv
• fakery
• cnn
• fox
• cbs
• nbc
• abc
• bbc
• wtc
• bush
• shoes
• crime
• crash
• hate
• love
• scam
• war
• iraq
• victims
• no
• planes
• hoax
• fake
• dogs
• cats
• boys
• girls
• commercial
• free

[mostdispleased]

Here's what I don't understand (And I don't take either side of this argument. Neither side has convinced me of their stories)... but, why would they continue to fake the shots AFTER the "planes" hit the towers? Surely you are not suggesting that the towers did not collapse? There should be no reason to continue to doctor the videos post-impacts.

[simonshack]

@mostdispleased

Please go to: tinyurl . com / collapseanimations (remove all spaces)

Think of the 9/11TV broadcasts as a full-fledged Hollywood movie. This has by now been demonstrated in every imaginable way. The WTC complex (9 buildings in all!) was of course demolished - but they had obviously no wish to show the real events on Live TV. In reality, the WTC was enveloped in smoke and no one was able to capture anything 'worthwhile' on film.

[simonshack]

Dear mostdispleased.

The events of the morning 9/11 had to be integrally replaced with a 'Hollywood-style' movie. Even the tower collapses shown on TV were part of this animated movie. Why? - you may ask ...:

1: The WTC demolition (which in reality occured behind a thick smokescreen) was not something they would want the entire world to see on LIVE TV.

2: The dramatic (yet physically absurd) top-down collapses as shown on TV were designed for shock-and-awe effect. We all fell for it, not?.

[TruthSeekingElf]

This is the most astonishing one of the series. If a sheep were to watch this and still come away thinking it was 'terrorists' then there is something mentally wrong with them. I don't think the illuminati give a fuck whether we know it was an inside job or not, they have gotten away with so much already and people won't wake up or unite, but the proof is right here for all to see. Excellent work here.

[simonshack]

@TruthSeekingElf

Thanks! Please diffuse. The tenth anniversary of this sordid hoax is coming up - and I think we should all be joyfully celebrating the fact that the sorry souls behind this scam have been roundly busted. :O)

[cjracer1000]

Is there an I?

[simonshack]

@cjracer1000

No - the next and last part is SEPTEMBER CLUES EPILOGUE.

[Shafaress]

Don't listen to them, those who don't beleive the evidence that is in front of their faces, are purposely blind to the trust. Why? Because they are not willing to beleive. Its time we started to treat America like adults and tell them what REALLY happened, even if it is scary, and out of this world.

These are great videos, with a mass of truth in them, thank you!

[arraba99]

While Rabbi Zakheim was Pentagon CFO leading up to 9/11, $2.3 Trillions went missing, no trace. Just 1 day before 9/11 Rumsfeld (a Zionist) admitted that - see (YT /watch?v=3kpWqdPMjmo). The investigation files just happen to be in the Pentagon section hit & burned in 9/11. a brilliant LUCKY coincident!

WAKE UP America; you are being duped, Islam/Iran is not the danger. ‘israel” lobby in USA is; pushing America to wars, scamming America while distracting from ‘israel” atrocities in Palestine.

[justinhu8]

where did you get some of the international footage

[peterp21]

@peterp21 Sorry, that should be 0:18 and 0:28.

[peterp21]

OK, so I waver back and forth on the no plane theory, but compare 0:22 and 0:28. WTF? I get that perspective and camera distance can have *some* effect on where the plane looks like it's coming from and where it's going, but the first clips shows a long clip of the plane going in a dead-on straight linie while the second clip shows the plane dropping by what looks like a steep vertical drop. To me that's very curious.

[ArjayBlogs]

@mostdispleased This whole documentary isnt suggesting that the towers collapsed, it is saying that what hit them and how they collapsed is not what you see in the media. Its like if you lie you have to remember the lie you told. So lie about the planes, you need to lie about the sounds, then you need to lie about the scenes of destruction and continue to lie about the collapse.

[Grifflaw]

where is part I?

[1lovekillsslowly]

Thank you for your work. I remember viewing the supposed 'live' coverage (pacific daylight time, as I lived in Nevada back then) and thinking to myself, this is not realistic. Especially when the towers fell, I knew it was a hoax then because if all enormous structures fell to the ground all prim and proper, why would we need demolition experts?

[yousuckyajackass]

@mostdispleased ... and my point had nothing to do with whether you were asking 'if' or 'why'... the point was how could they alter footage before the event? You stated "why would they continue to fake the shots AFTER"... how could they fake the shots before?? I also questioned why you thought anyone was suggesting the towers didn't collapse. You obviously have a difficult time understanding things, which brings me back to wondering if you are high when you type comments on here. : )