U.S. Citizens and the New World Order

New website:
http://getoutandstayoutofjail.com/

Voodoo Dolls of the Elite Part 1 http://vimeo.com/34862763
Voodoo Dolls of the Elite Part 2 http://vimeo.com/35844634
Wicked Game: Pawns and Passion http://vimeo.com/35421637

Hauntingly beautiful song, "O Quam Tristis" by Marco Rosano, an italian composer living in Belgium. Music Scores http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/lightmusic http://www.marcorosano.eu/

Graphic sources include Thrive:
http://musicians4freedom.com/2011/10/16/thrive-movie-premieres-in-san-francis...

Read the article
http://musicians4freedom.com/2011/10/18/u-s-citizens-and-the-new-world-order/

Have you heard of Colonel Mandell House?
http://musicians4freedom.com/2010/02/14/philip-dru-administrator-the-scott-ho...

The purpose of establishing government is to provide "protection" to those who expressly consent.
http://musicians4freedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/GovFranchises.pdf

Comparison of de jure and de facto at
http://www.usavsus.info

U.S. is a private corporation:
http://www.manta.com/c/mmg5dxg/government-of-the-united-states

Those who have made such a choice and thereby become "customers" of the protection afforded by government are called by any of the following names under the civil laws of the jurisdiction they have nominated to protect them:

--"citizens", or "residents" (aliens) if they were born within the country in which the jurisdiction is a part.

--"inhabitants", which encompasses both "citizens", and "residents" but excludes foreigners.

--"persons", or "individuals".

In law, the process of choosing a domicile within the jurisdiction of a specific government is called "animus manendi". More at http://www.sedm.org

That choice makes you a consenting party to the "civil contract", "social compact", and "private law" that attaches to and therefore protects all "inhabitants" and things physically situated on or within that specific territory, venue, and jurisdiction.

Hospitals are paid to forward birth certificates:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57966905/Hospitals-Get-Paid-4-Birth-Certificates

At M4F, we feel the problem is not so much "corporate personhood," but "people corporatehood." The solution to America's problems, and the planet's problems, is to restore the balance of power to individual people. Once people have learned how to be free & to defend and monetize our own unalienable rights under the common law, we'll have a better chance to restore a republic of free people without resorting to collectivist political movements that can be easily co-opted.

How to make and file a Fee Schedule for Protection Against Corporate Abuse
http://www.scribd.com/doc/66459977/Generic-Notice-of-Fee-Schedule-for-Colorad...

In the year 1297, the phrase, "Law of the Land," was used in the Magna Carta. Perhaps the most famous clause of Magna Carta states:

"No Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the Land."

In a sense then, your consent to a specific jurisdiction by your choice of domicile within that jurisdiction is what creates the "person", "individual", "citizen", "resident", or "inhabitant" which is the only proper subject of the civil laws passed by that government.

In America, a man or woman who has not consented to the jurisdiction of the U.S. is recognized by our founding documents as a "people" who is "sovereign." When he or she is coerced into commerce with the U.S., the one coercing you is in dishonor and must pay for that. That is why you need to honorably give them notice of your Fee Schedule so they will not dishonor themselves. If they do, the schedule gives them a way to reinstate their honor.
http://musicians4freedom.com/solutions-to-perceived-problems/restore-the-repu...

Barack Obama Admits All Government is by Consent
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JroPFrTxvo

Choosing a domicile within a specific jurisdiction causes an implied waiver of sovereign immunity, because the courts admit that the term "person" does not refer to the "sovereign":

"Since in common usage, the term person does not include the sovereign, statutes not employing the phrase are ordinarily construed to exclude it." [United States v. Cooper Corporation, 312 U.S. 600 (1941)]

"Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law for it is the author and source of law;" [Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)]

"There is no such thing as a power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States. In this country sovereignty resides in the People, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it: All else is withheld." [Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884)]

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Alfred Adask
• Bill Thornton
• 14th amendment
• Title 42 Civil Rights Act
• Alex Jones
• Infowars
• Aaron Dykes
• Do not consent
• rob menard
• john harris
• magna carta
• free man movement
• The Story of Burt
• A Journey to Freedom
• New World Order
• David Icke
• Thrive movie
• Alex Jones (radio Host)