Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

If the IRS & Medicare had a baby ...

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
6,119
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 7, 2009

"If the IRS and Medicare had a baby, it would look like this." -- Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX), Ranking House Republican, Joint Economic Committee (JEC), speaking on the JEC's new chart mapping the mega-bureaucracy that will result from the Pelosi health care bill.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Gov health care, "it's an option"???

    Punishable by fine and prison if you don't insure. What kind of "option" is that!

    Once your in you can never opt out!!!

    I see no option here. Typical Washington double talk.

  • 1913 - Democrats - Federal Reserve Act

    1913 - Democrats - Federal Income Tax (16th Amendment)

    1935 - Democrats - Social Security

    1965 - Democrats - Medicare

    2009 - Democrats - HR 3962 Healthcare Reform

see all

All Comments (101)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • That is one ugly baby...

  • If you accept the RFID chip, they can flag you in their central computer system, so that when your chip is scanned, the doctor is instructed by his medical computer to give you a certain kind of special drug, because the computer has determined that you need this.

    Unknown to you or the doctor, this special concoction is in some way toxic to you. Combined with certain additives in your other medications, it will weaken your system, or even outright kill you over time. How would anyone know?

  • Hmmm?

    You're on the health plan, go to the doctor, the doctor prescribes something unwanted, like Prozac, Ritalin, abortion, vasectomy, electroshock, vaccine, RFID chip "to streamline medical records," or some new concoction containing who-knows-what. You refuse it. The government kicks you off the plan, saying refusal of "treatment" will make you sicker and cost more money. Now, with no health plan, unable to pay the fine, they put you in one of those new prison camps until you accept it.

  • @IMPLR1369007

    I know that if people started by cleaning up their local governments, including police departments, by forcing them to state which side they were on, and having their Mayor network with other Mayors, it would be hard to keep out of the media. It might need to start at the block meeting level. I think Ross Perot started that idea, which was probably the main reason he was run out of town.

  • Nothing will ever get Congress to act on it because they are politicians, currently liberal politicians (not that it makes a difference) and being politicians they will do nothing that will diminish their power or income. They are politicians and therefore they are corrupt. Politicians of either camp cannot be counted on for much, but one thing is certain, they can be counted on to do whatever enhances their own careers.

  • @IMPLR1369007

    Your proposal sounds good, but what would motivate Congress to act on it?

    There is the Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3, but nobody in government seems interested in doing anything about it at this time.

    Section 4 is very interesting also, in reference to the national debt aquired through fraud by private bankers of the Federal Reserve Bank, Incorporated.

  • @1tuuber

    Agreed, passing a bill into law does require consensus in the Congress, but my proposal is preemption, in that it would REQUIRE Congress to throw out anyone who even proposed and unconstitutional law. This would even preclude Congress ignoring such actions.

  • @IMPLR1369007, "I propose Congress...." The only way to do this is probably to enact a Federal referendum, which only some of the States already have enacted. It may be necessary to begin at the City Counsel level, which would be good anyway.

    In order to get something un-Constitutional passed in congress, many of them must work together, influenced by some type of reward. This could qualify as conspiricy, racketeering, or even insurrection to the Constitution (which was mentioned in it).

  • @IMPLR1369007, "I beleive there is...." Right. Every time something has been tightly controlled, it has been only to create a monopoly. JFK's father made his fortune importing top quality booze, during prohibition. Currently the CIA is the only importer of drugs allowed. This is why we have "victomless crimes," like prostitution, to create a monopoly for organized crime. Hitler pitched gun registration "to prevent crime," then went to all the addresses and collected the listed arms.

  • I propose Congress Control. Such as immediate and mandatory impeachment for any member of Congress who proposes or supports any act or legislation that violates the Constitution, which they have sworn to uphold. This would include legislation that mandates the purchase of healthcare under threat of imprisonment.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more