Check out my latest vids, Do Not Consent: The Path to American Freedom; How to Make and File a Fee Schedule for Protection Against Corporate Abuse; also, Are You in Jail by Your Own Consent? Keep up the great activism! Peace, Ven
He is quite correct. Educate yourself as to the original intent of the Constitution and this REPUBLIC form of government... Not Federal Democracy. Look up "The Law" by Bastiat and Republic vs Democracy in my playlists. Our socialist, national education leaves us ignorant and uniformed as to the great experiment in Liberty called America.
In this hijacked "Federal Democracy" you are correct. In a Republic Original intent and obvious rendering of the Constitution is for the use of freemen to limit control of government. You have let the horses out of the corral and the fox into the hen house when; government is expected to limit its-self taking power from the inherent rights of free people.
Yes indeed...judges DO tell jurors what the law is. But the jury has the RIGHT to judge both law and fact but "they won't be told this." DOn't believe me? THese words are ON the US District COurt websites under jury instructions. Yep...DECEPTION at is best.
Can't you imagine that there were several crackpot alerts prior to Rosa Park's win at sitting in the front of the bus? As short as a few decades ago, many black's attempted--before Rosa--to sit on the front of the bus. And what did the judges and lawyers tell blacks? "Our laws say you are inferior! Our cops by the law beat the heck out of you...its ok...because the judges tell them so."
We need a Judicial Department to operate according to Article III! Executive constituted Tribunals are good for many things but people should be fairly warned of their commercial nature. I agree with you that making these "arguments" in front of said courts will be "frivolous", the judge must rule only on what is presented.
Check out my latest vids, Do Not Consent: The Path to American Freedom; How to Make and File a Fee Schedule for Protection Against Corporate Abuse; also, Are You in Jail by Your Own Consent? Keep up the great activism! Peace, Ven
sharlenemusiclover 4 months ago
and he wears the panties to prove it
nancinmofo 2 years ago
He is quite correct. Educate yourself as to the original intent of the Constitution and this REPUBLIC form of government... Not Federal Democracy. Look up "The Law" by Bastiat and Republic vs Democracy in my playlists. Our socialist, national education leaves us ignorant and uniformed as to the great experiment in Liberty called America.
shopken1 2 years ago
In this hijacked "Federal Democracy" you are correct. In a Republic Original intent and obvious rendering of the Constitution is for the use of freemen to limit control of government. You have let the horses out of the corral and the fox into the hen house when; government is expected to limit its-self taking power from the inherent rights of free people.
shopken1 2 years ago
this guy is a crackpot
nancinmofo 3 years ago
this guy is a certified crackpot
nancinmofo 3 years ago
Yes indeed...judges DO tell jurors what the law is. But the jury has the RIGHT to judge both law and fact but "they won't be told this." DOn't believe me? THese words are ON the US District COurt websites under jury instructions. Yep...DECEPTION at is best.
lawfulldave 4 years ago
Can't you imagine that there were several crackpot alerts prior to Rosa Park's win at sitting in the front of the bus? As short as a few decades ago, many black's attempted--before Rosa--to sit on the front of the bus. And what did the judges and lawyers tell blacks? "Our laws say you are inferior! Our cops by the law beat the heck out of you...its ok...because the judges tell them so."
lawfulldave 4 years ago
Its been some time but I don't suspect this to be one of the ideal topics to discuss while drinking in BARs across America either.
PewterPlunder 5 years ago
We need a Judicial Department to operate according to Article III! Executive constituted Tribunals are good for many things but people should be fairly warned of their commercial nature. I agree with you that making these "arguments" in front of said courts will be "frivolous", the judge must rule only on what is presented.
PewterPlunder 5 years ago