Sunder on What Controlled Demolition Looks Like (see video comments)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
735 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 21, 2011

Update: Yet another controlled demolition expert, Tom Sullivan, on camera :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5IgqJXyLbg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14-PHDS5h0g

About this video:
S. Shyam Sunder, head of NIST's WTC investigation, explains what controlled demolition looks like when discussing the WTC7 report in 2008. An introduction to logical fallacies and their importance in evaluating science.

Category:

Education

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (iBlindGame)

  • watch him at 3:25 - he nods his head while stating "...it was was not a controlled demolition". This is one of the many signs he displays that he is lying and he knows it.

  • @ThePassiveFist I am especially amused by a head nod he made at about the same time at 40:30 in the 8/21/2008 media briefing when he hears this: "The part of that that I have trouble with..." It's as if he understands that there will be problems with what he has said. (In fact, none of his arguments against CD are based on logic.)

    video dot google dot com slash videoplay?docid=44261029657207­61539#

    Please see the other videos on my channel, including this one:

    watch?v=iQdJuQLNFCk

  • @ThePassiveFist These are known as microexpressions in case you want to do more research.

    They also employ "distancing language" in numerous cases.

  • Yet another controlled demolition expert speaks up, supporting what Danny Jowenko says.

    Search on YouTube for "Tom Sullivan controlled demolition."

Top Comments

  • "He who will not reason is a bigot, he who cannot is a fool, he who dares not is a slave." -- William Drummond, Scottish poet, 1585-1649

Video Responses

This video is a response to How to Destroy the 9/11 Truth Movement
see all

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @DuRound2 This video teaches the fallacy "proof by example." Perhaps you need to watch the other video "We Have the Results and Only We Have the Results" to understand that this is not an isolated example of fallacious reasoning in NIST's reasoning. You wrote, claiming that you see no problems with the NIST report, suggesting you know nothing about the fallacies. Knowing the fallacies helps make you an intellectual. "An intellectual is a person whose mind watches itself." -- Albert Camus

  • Very funny! But don't stay here, folks! Email this URL to NIST, your local media, and your congressional delegation. If you dare, Email it to your local officials and let them know that the whole war on terror business hinges on this charade.

    Love,

  • Great video! Thanks for your hard work and commitment to TRUTH AND JUSTICE!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more