Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

24-3-Day Formation of Grand Canyon

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,039
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 21, 2009

Episode 24 of RUSS ONLINE.

www.creationministries.org

  • likes, 17 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (CreationMinistries)

  • if it takes hours to form the grand canyon the river near my house should have eroded the surrounding rocks, the nearby dam, and all the old bridge pillars made from stone. but they have been there for over 100 years..hmm

  • @bauerkurt87 Several canyons have been observed to have formed in massive waterflows, such as following a breached dam. On the other hand, If rivers carve out huge canyons over millions of years, and if earth were billions of years old, every river, stream and creek should be a Grand Canyon by now

  • of course a pyroclastic flow coupled with massive ice melt, carrying trees, huge rocks will erode soil within hours...

  • @bauerkurt87 Accounting for the nearby perified forest as well

see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @RussMiller1000 The Coconino Sandstone is desert sandstone. It has desert fossils in it, desert sand and wind crossbedding. The Redwall has slow growing Corals.

  • @gregrutz Which is a fancy way of say spontaneous generation

  • @gregrutz Actually the water flows southwest & the north rim is not "wider." The north rim is 1,000 feet higher due to the slope of the Kaibab Upwarp through which the canyon cuts. This uplifted 4,500 feet of strata (unbroken as they were still mud) formed the dam thru which the waters quickly carved out Grand Canyon.

    Why don't old-earth believers ever discuss the mile deep layer of strata missing from atop the Canyon's rim? Because a global flood erodes all old-earth beliefs

  • @massimmortal There is no v-shaped Grand Canyon; there is no logical explanation of how Grand Canyon could have formed slowly; The 908 cubic miles of missing sediments are indeed missing - the small delta is post-formation; The Scablands and many other canyons have formed quickly - moving water is quite powerful.

  • More evidence is piling up against old-earth beliefs that have been taught as 'science' about Grand Canyon. No desert sand dunes are found at GC. The dunes found formed underwater and the evidence is staggering. When will secular 'science' start teachng the truth?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more