Chemtrails and Climate: Evidence in Plain Sight (2 of 6)
Loading...
652
views
Loading...
see all
Video Responses
This video is a response to Chemtrails and Climate: Evidence in Plain Sight (3 of 6)
Loading...
I don't think I have ever seen such an unconvincing presenter as this guy.
onlywhenpissed 1 month ago
Youtube: Speak Up Or Choke.
seekYEthetruth 2 years ago
@RefugeeT I only 'got' your sarcasm after it was spelled out to the other fella.
But what an excellent point you make. I never thought of that. Ditto spot on.
seekYEthetruth 2 years ago
i have a plane on my site with 2 engines giving out 8 trails
61shirley 2 years ago
@poodle559 hahha your sarcasm is spot on... it was my slow response i think. I agree with what you're sayin. Peace
RefugeeT 2 years ago
@RefugeeT I know the pentegon wasn't hit by a missile...ooops i ment to say plane, we all know it wasn't.............that was the whole point of my comment my love. planes don't leave trails at low altitude. However, the cctv photos that the pentegon released to the peasants after the so called attack suggests that they do. I'm sorry if you didn't get it, maybe i need to re-tune my sarcasm. peace.
poodle559 2 years ago
no plane hit the pentagon - there was no debris left of any plane, the scene was liturally 'covered up' with gravel, the 'impact' zone was to small for a plane to have made it, no one saw the plane, there's no footage of it. To me chemtrails wouldn't be a surprise after 9/11 and these illegal wars. It resembles Operation Northwoods a lil bit to much. Peace
RefugeeT 2 years ago
no you don't get con trails below 15'000ft, very true, but if you fly a plane into the pentegon you leave one 60ft above the ground........................food for thought people.
poodle559 2 years ago